Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
15 Mar 2011, 22:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
72% (01:29) correct
28%
(01:35)
wrong
based on 1274
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Although we could replace the beautiful—but dilapidated—old bridge across Black River with a concrete skyway, we should instead replace it with a cable bridge even though this would be more expensive than building a concrete skyway. The extra cost is clearly justified by the importance of maintaining the beauty of our river crossing.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) It is no more costly to maintain a cable bridge than a concrete skyway.
(B) A concrete skyway would not have any practical advantages over a cable bridge.
(C) The beauty of the river crossing must be preserved.
(D) If the new cable bridge is built, most people who see it will think the extra money well spent.
(E) Building a cable bridge across Black River would produce a more aesthetically pleasing result than building a concrete skyway.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) It is no more costly to maintain a cable bridge than a concrete skyway.
(B) A concrete skyway would not have any practical advantages over a cable bridge.
(C) The beauty of the river crossing must be preserved.
(D) If the new cable bridge is built, most people who see it will think the extra money well spent.
(E) Building a cable bridge across Black River would produce a more aesthetically pleasing result than building a concrete skyway.
01 Dec 2021, 15:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
vjsharma25
EXPLANATION FROM POWER PREP
The argument in the stimulus appears as follows:
- Premise: Although we could replace the beautiful—but dilapidated—old bridge across Black River with a concrete skyway,
Conclusion: we should instead replace it with a cable bridge
Premise: even though this would be more expensive than building a concrete skyway.
Premise: The extra cost is clearly justified by the importance of maintaining the beauty of our river crossing.
Since you are asked to identify an assumption on which the argument depends, you must look for any leaps in the reasoning (Supporters), or any ideas that threaten the stimulus that must be rejected (Defenders).
As in any Assumption question, consider the conclusion: we should replace the old bridge with a cable bridge. Why is that the case? The author states that we must do so despite the expense in order to maintain the beauty of the river crossing (this reasoning is extremely questionable because it fails to consider that a properly designed concrete skyway might be just as beautiful as a cable bridge). Most students, when examining this stimulus, see that connection and realize that the author has assumed that the cable bridge will be more attractive. Using that prephrase, they are then able to effectively dispose of this question by accelerating through this problem and selecting (E).
If you did not see that connection after reading the stimulus, do not forget to use the Assumption Negation Technique, which can help confirm that you have selected the correct answer.
Answer choice (A): The author does not see cost as a major issue, so the author is not committed to the idea that the cable bridge is not more costly to maintain.
If you are unconvinced, negate the answer, and consider how the author would respond to the negation. Even if the cable bridge were more expensive to maintain, the author of this argument might still insist that the beauty is worth the cost, so this response is not critical to the argument.
Answer choice (B): The argument cannot depend on an assumption that is contradictory to the argument’s premises (cost advantage is most certainly a practical advantage), so this response is definitely wrong. Furthermore, even allowing for some leeway with this response, the author might not care about practical concerns.
Answer choice (C): This is the most attractive incorrect answer. However, “beauty” in this stimulus is only tied to a concept the author wishes to maintain, and the author is not tied to a specific level of beauty. For example, preservation implies a reasonably equal level of beauty, and technically the author’s argument allows for the possibility that preservation of the site’s current level of beauty is not essential. The author could accept some lower standard of beauty, and therefore still choose to advocate a more beautiful bridge.
From an Assumption Negation Technique standpoint, the correct negation of this answer is: “The beauty of the river crossing does not necessarily need to be preserved.” In response to this negation, the author could note that while it doesn’t need to be preserved, there are still benefits to having some level of beauty present, and that therefore the cable bridge is still the preferred choice.
Answer choice (D): This answer choice trades on how people would react to the cable bridge, but popular opinion is not a good method of proof or disproof on the LSAT. Even if most people believed the money poorly spent, the money could still be well spent. Also, people could simply have no particular opinion at all, and that would not damage the argument. In the realm of argumentation, opinions mean little and prove less. Search for an answer with a basis in fact.
Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice. If you are uncertain as to whether this answer is correct, use the Assumption Negation Technique. If the cable bridge is not more beautiful than the concrete bridge, how is the author’s argument affected? Because beauty was a driving factor in advocating a cable bridge, the negation of this answer choice would severely weaken the author’s argument, and hence this answer is correct.
Mechanistically, notice that “beauty” appears in one of the premises and nowhere else, and “cable bridge” appears in the conclusion but nowhere else. Not surprisingly, these ideas are linked in this assumption of the argument.
31 Dec 2021, 15:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
vjsharma25
EXPLANATION FROM Fox LSAT
It’s a fairly straightforward argument.
- Premise: Our old bridge is beautiful but dilapidated.
- Premise: Cable bridges are more expensive than concrete skyways.
- Premise: It’s important to maintain the beauty of our river crossing.
- Conclusion: We should build a cable bridge, not a concrete skyway.
The argument has assumed, at a minimum, that a cable bridge is more beautiful than a concrete skyway. If that’s not true, then why would the extra expense of
the cable bridge possibly be justified?
A) Maintenance costs weren’t even contemplated. I don’t see how this could be a necessary component of the argument.
B) The argument was only about building costs and beauty. I don’t know why other “practical advantages,” whatever they may be, are relevant.
C) I don’t think this is a missing piece of the argument, because the argument already presents, as a premise, “the importance of maintaining the beauty of our river crossing.” On an assumption question, we need to find a missing piece. Tricky, but this isn’t it.
D) Even if this isn’t true, the speaker might still believe that we should build the cable bridge. The speaker might say, “Who cares what people think, most people are stupid. Let’s build the cable bridge." We need an answer that, if untrue, would ruin the argument.
E) Yep, exactly. If this answer is untrue, then a concrete skyway would be just as beautiful, and we already know it’s cheaper. So why wouldn’t we build the concrete skyway? The speaker wouldn’t have any rational retort. This answer must be true or the argument fails: that’s the definition of a necessary assumption.
The answer is E.
