It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 10:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR Education statistics

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 194

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 03:18
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:46) correct 16% (00:51) wrong based on 797 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It’s time we stopped searching for new statistics to suggest that we are not spending enough on education. In fact, education spending increased 30 percent overall during the last decade.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Despite increased spending on education, enrollment in our elementary and secondary schools declined about 4 percent during the last ten years.
(B) Our spending on gasoline increased more than 100 percent during the last decade.
(C) When adjusted for inflation, our per-pupil expenditure on education this year is less than it was ten years ago.
(D) Eleven other economically developed nations spend more on education than we do.
(E) The achievement levels of our students have been declining steadily since 1960, and the last decade produced no reversal in this trend.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1408

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 06:09
1
KUDOS
In fact, education spending increased 30 percent overall during the last decade.

Evidence is that education spending increased over last decade by 30%

It’s time we stopped searching for new statistics to suggest that we are not spending enough on education.

Conclusion is to stop searching for new statistics or other wise saying that based on the stated evidence above, we are spending enough on education.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Despite increased spending on education, enrollment in our elementary and secondary schools declined about 4 percent during the last ten years.

A is about enrollment and not about whether we are spending more or less

(B) Our spending on gasoline increased more than 100 percent during the last decade.

B Ok Gas spending has nothing to do with edu spending.

(C) When adjusted for inflation, our per-pupil expenditure on education this year is less than it was ten years ago.

offers counter evidence that we are not spending enough on education. Probably this is it??

(D) Eleven other economically developed nations spend more on education than we do.

Does it matter?

(E) The achievement levels of our students have been declining steadily since 1960, and the last decade produced no reversal in this trend.

Again irrelevant here.

My pick
C
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 435

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 08:40
hibloom wrote:
It’s time we stopped searching for new statistics to suggest that we are not spending enough on education. In fact, education spending increased 30 percent overall during the last decade.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Despite increased spending on education, enrollment in our elementary and secondary schools declined about 4 percent during the last ten years.
(B) Our spending on gasoline increased more than 100 percent during the last decade.
(C) When adjusted for inflation, our per-pupil expenditure on education this year is less than it was ten years ago.
(D) Eleven other economically developed nations spend more on education than we do.
(E) The achievement levels of our students have been declining steadily since 1960, and the last decade produced no reversal in this trend.

IMO C)
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 11:43
IMO C.

Everything else is out of scope
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1381

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 21:15
hibloom wrote:
It’s time we stopped searching for new statistics to suggest that we are not spending enough on education. In fact, education spending increased 30 percent overall during the last decade.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Despite increased spending on education, enrollment in our elementary and secondary schools declined about 4 percent during the last ten years. => enrollment is actualy irrelevant here we are talking about spending on education
(B) Our spending on gasoline increased more than 100 percent during the last decade. => irrelevant here
(C) When adjusted for inflation, our per-pupil expenditure on education this year is less than it was ten years ago. -> this is apt since though we are said to spend enough here we find per pupil money spent is less than 10 years ago. hence states that we are not spending more though overal spent amount increased
(D) Eleven other economically developed nations spend more on education than we do. -> irrelevant
(E) The achievement levels of our students have been declining steadily since 1960, and the last decade produced no reversal in this trend. -> this is irtrelevant

Clearly C
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 635

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2008, 11:21
Another C.

We already spent 30% more than last decade; therefore we stopped searching for any statistics related to minute spending on education. Any statement, which could reveal that actually we are spending less than what we did in previous years, will definitely intrigue us.
A: Enrollment is not the point of discussion
B: Gasoline I OOS
C: True, shows the difference
D: But how it affects our discussion?
E: Achievement is not the point of discussion
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 194

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2008, 19:10
i also thought C but i am confused y it can t be A maybe the 30pc increase was because 4 pc decline in enrollment and not because the authority actually increased the spending.
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 235

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2008, 03:33
C
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 94

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 07:43
It's a clear C. Yeah
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
Location: INDIA

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 08:07
IMO C.

All other options are out of scope..
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 154

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 09:13
I would go with C
Intern
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 5

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 09:34
My choice is C too
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 16:19
C.

I guess one of the very few questions on which all members are unanimous with their answers
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Location: So. CA
WE 1: 2 IT
WE 2: 4 Software Analyst

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 17:32
Yea, definitely C, so far one of the easier weaken Qs that I have come across.
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 192

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 17:57
i went with C since it closely indicates that the expediture has gone down per-pupil ie: inflation could be eating into the budgets and hence the 30% wasnt enough. thanks icandy for stating conclusion clearly.
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2010
Posts: 3

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 19:12
Clearly, C
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 29
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 20:18
I chose C as well, but I thought D was a strong contender as well, considering the fact that our spending could've been very low to start with, a decade ago, so 30% higher is not much compared to other developed nations. But I agree that its a bit out of scope.
Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2010
Posts: 166
Location: singapore

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 23:42
+1 for C,

Conclusion :education spending increased 30 %

Assumption : There is a spending on the eduction

We need to weaken the assumption , the amount has increased due to inflation but not with any other reason. i.e. directly weaking the argument.
_________________

Regards,
Nagesh
My GMAT Study Plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-gmat-study-plan-112833.html
Idioms List : http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-idioms-104283.html?hilit=idioms#p813231
--------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if you like my posts

Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 8

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2010, 01:51
IMO C
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 276

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2010, 03:32
IMO C.
_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

Re: CR Education statistics   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2010, 03:32

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Although statistics and definitions are inexact, educated guesses put 2 20 Jun 2017, 20:26
7 Recent Statistic make it seem unlikely----CR from Kaplan 4 16 Feb 2016, 06:24
77 Hard CR questions involving proportion/numbers/statistics 56 16 May 2016, 07:07
2 The lobbyists argued that because there is no statistical 8 20 Jul 2016, 11:38
CR 11 12 Feb 2017, 11:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by