Last visit was: 12 May 2026, 08:31 It is currently 12 May 2026, 08:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
harshi
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Last visit: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Posts: 24
Kudos: 84
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
banerjeea_98
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Last visit: 17 May 2012
Posts: 674
Own Kudos:
Posts: 674
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Folaa3
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Last visit: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
Posts: 382
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anandnk
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Last visit: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 893
Own Kudos:
Location: NewJersey USA
Posts: 893
Kudos: 426
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Definitely (E)
Everything else except the interaction of neurons is known. It is possible that interaction of neurons may never be known.
User avatar
chunjuwu
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Last visit: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 541
Own Kudos:
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 541
Kudos: 4,917
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="harshi"]18. “Physicalistsâ€
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,053
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The conclusion contradicts the claim of the physicalists.
- No. It does not contradict the claim. The conclusion actually supports the claim that ultimately, all mental functions will be explainable in neurobiological terms.

(B) The passage fails to describe exactly what is currently known about the basic functions of neurons.

(C) The word “neurobiologicalâ€
User avatar
Folaa3
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Last visit: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
Posts: 382
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA for this please because i don't believe any test would have such a straightforward ans
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,987
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,987
Kudos: 2,053
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Folaa3
OA for this please because i don't believe any test would have such a straightforward ans


don't think too much. sometimes it could be that easy. :-D
User avatar
Folaa3
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Last visit: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 382
Own Kudos:
Posts: 382
Kudos: 131
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ywilfred
Folaa3
OA for this please because i don't believe any test would have such a straightforward ans

don't think too much. sometimes it could be that easy. :-D


that would be great :lol:
User avatar
Taku
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Last visit: 02 May 2005
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 1,325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I couldn't understand what the sentences exactly mean. I thought B and E seemed to be OK and saw that E is better so I would go with E.

(A) The conclusion contradicts the claim of the physicalists.
-> No, the conclusion does not contradict the claim.

(B) The passage fails to describe exactly what is currently known about the basic functions of neurons.
-> It is not an issue to describe about the basic functions of neurons, but the important is to know it and how the neurons interest it.

(C) The word “neurobiological” is used as though it had the same meaning as the word “mental.
-> Out of scope.

(D) The argument does not indicate whether it would be useful to explain mental functions in neurobiological terms.
-> Out of scope.

(E) The passage does not indicate that any knowledge has been achieved about how neurons interact.
-> It is said that neurons & their basic functions and the delineation are the key for physicalists to explain mental functions. I think passage did indicate about neurons and delineations, but did not about neuron's basic functions which is a knowledge of how neurons interact.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
562 posts
363 posts