Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 4 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we tackle the most intimidating CR question type: Boldface & "Legalese" questions. If you've ever stared at an answer choice that reads, "The first is a consideration introduced to counter a position that...
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
(A) The conclusion contradicts the claim of the physicalists.
- No. It does not contradict the claim. The conclusion actually supports the claim that ultimately, all mental functions will be explainable in neurobiological terms.
(B) The passage fails to describe exactly what is currently known about the basic functions of neurons.
I couldn't understand what the sentences exactly mean. I thought B and E seemed to be OK and saw that E is better so I would go with E.
(A) The conclusion contradicts the claim of the physicalists.
-> No, the conclusion does not contradict the claim.
(B) The passage fails to describe exactly what is currently known about the basic functions of neurons.
-> It is not an issue to describe about the basic functions of neurons, but the important is to know it and how the neurons interest it.
(C) The word “neurobiological” is used as though it had the same meaning as the word “mental.
-> Out of scope.
(D) The argument does not indicate whether it would be useful to explain mental functions in neurobiological terms.
-> Out of scope.
(E) The passage does not indicate that any knowledge has been achieved about how neurons interact.
-> It is said that neurons & their basic functions and the delineation are the key for physicalists to explain mental functions. I think passage did indicate about neurons and delineations, but did not about neuron's basic functions which is a knowledge of how neurons interact.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.