Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 16:42 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 16:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Haik
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,157
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,680
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,157
Kudos: 83,726
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Haik
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VeritasPrepBrian
User avatar
Veritas Prep Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Last visit: 02 Mar 2022
Posts: 416
Own Kudos:
3,270
 [3]
Given Kudos: 63
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 416
Kudos: 3,270
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Glad to hear you're enjoying the test, Haik, and congratulations on achieving so much success with them! A few thoughts on scoring reliability:

-Our tests are administered and scored using Item Response Theory (the same system that the GMAT and GRE use), and so both user ability and question difficulty is determined using our ~4.5 million user responses in the system. That's why we've been able to enjoy such (relatively) accurate scoring - we're not guessing at question difficulty via "easy/medium/hard," but instead using the same kind of data-driven system that powers all the official tests.

-Similar to the official tests, though, the data is a little less robust at the ends of the bell curves. The folks at GMAC have admitted that they're less confident in the accuracy of a 750 vs. a 770 than they are in the accuracy of a 650 vs. 670, and we'd have to admit the same. Given that most users will at some point see 650-level questions (whether they're 700 level but missed a couple "easy" ones or they're a 600 level but got a few hard ones right), but significantly fewer will see the 750-level questions, the data just isn't as powerful at the poles.

-Pursuant to that...I just went into the system to check the error margins on your tests, and as I'd kind of expect you're probably looking at a 40-50 point standard error on those as opposed to the normal ~30. So I'd probably take from your test that you're "poised to score well above 700" but not necessarily that you're a 790 scorer.

-Anecdotally, I trust our quant scores almost to the exact point...I've had students take as many as 10 quant sections with really accurate scoring each time and congruent to their test day scores. Verbal is just a little less precise, in large part because the item difficulty and user abilities are all calculated using user stats, and those verbal skills haven't quite produced as concrete of IRT data curves as the quant skills have (which, as I've read in academic literature, is what a lot of these tests find, too). So I've recommended to my own students that they take their verbal score with a few points on either side as a range, whereas their quant score is something that they can be very, very confident in. The overall net effect is that the scores have been even more accurate than we would have predicted when we started, but particularly at the upper limits that "within 30 points" stat widens just a little bit largely due to an increased verbal error margin.

I hope that helps...
User avatar
scottshrum
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,117
Own Kudos:
230
 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Schools:Kellogg MBA 2004
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,117
Kudos: 230
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Haik, one more thought: It's very normal to get a number of questions wrong and still get a very high score. Think about how a computer-adaptive test works: It's supposed to give you questions that are appropriate given your estimated ability level. If you get everything right, then the questions aren't hard enough! This is even true for very high scores -- no one is expected to get EVERY question right!

You can read more about this here:

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2013/07 ... ice-tests/

Scott
avatar
Haik
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepBrian

I also feel that I am not a 790 scorer; although I expect 50-51 on the quant, my verbal is far from being perfect. Anyway, I will post the actual result here. The test is scheduled on 29 of May ;)

quixx23

Thanks for the insight.
avatar
sasif
Joined: 01 Jun 2014
Last visit: 08 Jun 2014
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Haik,

Would Love to hear an update as to how close your actual GMAT score was to the veritas Prep.
avatar
Haik
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
4
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FYI, I have taken the exam today. The total score is 760 (Q50, V44)&IR 7. I feel that I could have scored higher on quant, but nonetheless, given that English is my third (if any) language, this is also a great score :)

VeritasPrep tests are probably the best in terms of the content. Verbal score may sometimes be inflated, but the questions, especially in the quantitative section, were very similar to the actual ones. Kudos to the VeritasPrep team. Guys, you are awesome ;)

MGMAT and GmatClub also offer great tests, but their value is in the difficulty of the questions rather than proximity to the actual exam. Do not take their scores seriously and concentrate on studying the material and tricks through these tests.
avatar
camo
Joined: 25 May 2013
Last visit: 15 Feb 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Haik,

Congrats for your score !! Awesome!

I would like to have, if possible, your input from your experience on the real GMAT test and the veritas tests:

My understanding is that the quant veritas test is so similar to the real GMAT test. Is this related to the content of the questions, the score, or both?

In connection with the verbal section: In which subsection (CR, RC, SC) the difference is the more obvious between the veritas test and the real GMAT test?

What do you think about the scoring of the verbal section on the veritas test?

Finally, in your opinion, the real GMAT verbal questions are the most similar to which material products? Did you have the occasion to work of the comprehension list of the SC, CR and RC published on this site? Is there a similarity between the questions of those lists and the real GMAT you took?

Many thanks for your input and your help on this!

My score on the veritas tests are the following: 700, 690, 690, 660,660 and 660. The quant is between 47 and 48 and the verbal is between 33 and 38 (the difference on the verbal score depends on a good level om my physical state when i took those tests)
avatar
Haik
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello camo,

camo
Hello Haik,

My understanding is that the quant veritas test is so similar to the real GMAT test. Is this related to the content of the questions, the score, or both?

In my opinion, Veritas quant closely resembles to the real test both in the content and scoring. However, note that I have used other sources as well in my preparation. Do not rely solely on Veritas tests, rather use them as a valid estimator.

camo

In connection with the verbal section: In which subsection (CR, RC, SC) the difference is the more obvious between the veritas test and the real GMAT test?

What do you think about the scoring of the verbal section on the veritas test?

In terms of the content the Veritas verbal section was not different from the real test, at least for me. Although, the scoring of verbal section was sometimes inflated, I think you should not be concerned with that, since you score in 70-80th percentiles, for which there are plenty of questions. The score is distorted only for very high percentiles, i.e. 98,99, because the system lacks data for very tough questions.

camo

Finally, in your opinion, the real GMAT verbal questions are the most similar to which material products? Did you have the occasion to work of the comprehension list of the SC, CR and RC published on this site? Is there a similarity between the questions of those lists and the real GMAT you took?

I will repeat myself: Veritas questions are the most representative (of course, except of the official ones). Yet, use them in conjunction with Gmat Club tests and Manhattan, because these are really useful to build stamina and learn the concepts.

camo

Many thanks for your input and your help on this!

My score on the veritas tests are the following: 700, 690, 690, 660,660 and 660. The quant is between 47 and 48 and the verbal is between 33 and 38 (the difference on the verbal score depends on a good level om my physical state when i took those tests)

Practice creates masters!! Work hard, it always pays off ;)

Hope this helps, and good luck to you.
User avatar
amenon55
Joined: 27 Apr 2014
Last visit: 11 Jun 2015
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Posts: 35
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepBrian
Glad to hear you're enjoying the test, Haik, and congratulations on achieving so much success with them! A few thoughts on scoring reliability:

-Our tests are administered and scored using Item Response Theory (the same system that the GMAT and GRE use), and so both user ability and question difficulty is determined using our ~4.5 million user responses in the system. That's why we've been able to enjoy such (relatively) accurate scoring - we're not guessing at question difficulty via "easy/medium/hard," but instead using the same kind of data-driven system that powers all the official tests.

-Similar to the official tests, though, the data is a little less robust at the ends of the bell curves. The folks at GMAC have admitted that they're less confident in the accuracy of a 750 vs. a 770 than they are in the accuracy of a 650 vs. 670, and we'd have to admit the same. Given that most users will at some point see 650-level questions (whether they're 700 level but missed a couple "easy" ones or they're a 600 level but got a few hard ones right), but significantly fewer will see the 750-level questions, the data just isn't as powerful at the poles.

-Pursuant to that...I just went into the system to check the error margins on your tests, and as I'd kind of expect you're probably looking at a 40-50 point standard error on those as opposed to the normal ~30. So I'd probably take from your test that you're "poised to score well above 700" but not necessarily that you're a 790 scorer.

-Anecdotally, I trust our quant scores almost to the exact point...I've had students take as many as 10 quant sections with really accurate scoring each time and congruent to their test day scores. Verbal is just a little less precise, in large part because the item difficulty and user abilities are all calculated using user stats, and those verbal skills haven't quite produced as concrete of IRT data curves as the quant skills have (which, as I've read in academic literature, is what a lot of these tests find, too). So I've recommended to my own students that they take their verbal score with a few points on either side as a range, whereas their quant score is something that they can be very, very confident in. The overall net effect is that the scores have been even more accurate than we would have predicted when we started, but particularly at the upper limits that "within 30 points" stat widens just a little bit largely due to an increased verbal error margin.

I hope that helps...

MGMAT 1: 5/May : 570 (Q37, V31)
MGMAT 2: 17/May:600(Q41, V32) - went 5 mins overtime each section(paused the clock)
MGMAT 3: 6/June: 580(Q37, V32)
VerCAT : 15/June: 710 (Q49, V38)

I felt Veritas 700 level quant were the equivalent to MGMAT's 500 level.

I'm exploring the option of buying some more Veritas tests. However, this huge bump in my score makes me skeptical of the reliability.

Can someone pls. explain this bump in my score after 1 week of prep?
User avatar
scottshrum
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Schools:Kellogg MBA 2004
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,117
Kudos: 230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amenon55


MGMAT 1: 5/May : 570 (Q37, V31)
MGMAT 2: 17/May:600(Q41, V32) - went 5 mins overtime each section(paused the clock)
MGMAT 3: 6/June: 580(Q37, V32)
VerCAT : 15/June: 710 (Q49, V38)

I felt Veritas 700 level quant were the equivalent to MGMAT's 500 level.

I'm exploring the option of buying some more Veritas tests. However, this huge bump in my score makes me skeptical of the reliability.

Can someone pls. explain this bump in my score after 1 week of prep?


I won't make claims about the accuracy (or inaccuracy) of any other test prep companies' practice tests, but I would caution you against judging your score progress by looking at your score on one company's test and then comparing to how you later did on another company's test. Is it that the first test scored you too low? Did the second test score you too high? Did you truly improve that much over the past two weeks? It may be all of the above.

We at Veritas Prep are extremely confident about the score accuracy of our tests (and we have the data to back it up), so I am willing to say that you're much closer to 700 right now than to 600, assuming that you perform as well on test day. But, be careful with these comparisons!

Scott
avatar
bhishma2407
Joined: 20 Apr 2013
Last visit: 23 Apr 2016
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello all
Im planning to give my GMAT in June. I had given the veritas prep 1 week ago where my score was 690. In the next week, i gave the manhattan prep test in which my score was 630. Im a little confused about which test should i consider closer to my real score and how much more work should i put in. Hope to hear from u soon...

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
193 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts