CARK
Hi Mike
One of the GMAT prep question (very similar to this one) is reproduced hereunder
The health benefits of tea have been the subject of much research; in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting some forms of cancer, the brewed leaves of Camellia sinensis may also play a role in reducing the risk of heart disease and stroke.
A. in addition to its possibilities for preventing and inhibiting
B. in addition to its possibilities to prevent or inhibit
C. besides the possibility that it prevents and inhibits
D. besides the possible preventing and inhibiting of
E. besides possibly preventing or inhibiting.
OA : E
In this official question (in option A, B and C) can be eliminated because of use of "its" / "it" (singular pronoun) to refer "the brewed leaves" (Plural)....Is this a correct reason for eliminating? I am asking this question because the structure of given subject question (Dark Chocolate) is very similar to official question (tea)
Dear CARK,
I'm happy to respond.
As is typical, this question from GMAT Prep is truly excellent. As someone who writes questions, I am always in awe of the high quality of questions that that GMAC consistently publishes. This question, though superficially similar, is actually quite different from the question above.
You see, I would say the "
its" is perfectly correct ---- the topic of the entire sentence is clearly "
tea," and the "
its" could be read as referring to that. For example, if you replace "
its" with "
tea's," it works logically in any of the five answer choices. A pronoun issue is not the problem here.
The first two --- "
In addition to its possibility to/for ..." ---- what a atrocious swollen monstrosity that is! Those two seem to be competing in a context for the longest and most awkward way to convey this information. That's why
(A) and
(B) are wrong.
The problem with
(C) and
(D) concerns the usage of the words "
besides." If X and Y are both nouns, then the structure "
besides X, Y ... " demands that X and Y are comparable. A typical mistake pattern would be to juxtapose the "
besides" phrase with the wrong part of the sentence:
Besides France, Herbert traveled to ... WRONG! "
France" and "
Herbert" are not two comparable items.
With this in mind, think about
(C) and
(D):
(C) ...
besides the possibility .... the brewed leaves ...(D) ...
besides the ... preventing and inhibiting .. the brewed leaves ....The "
brewed leaves" are concrete nouns, not comparable to a "
possibility" or to abstract actions, "
preventing and inhibiting." Notice that the complex gerund, a gerund with a definite article, is more "noun-like." That's why
(C) and
(D) are wrong.
We have eliminated everything else, so we hope
(E) works! Sure enough, it does. The idiomatic structure:
"beside" + [simple gerund]. [noun] ...is 100% correct, and it is understood that the noun is the actor of the action of the verb in gerund form. Thus,
(E) ...
besides possibly preventing or inhibiting ... the brewed leaves ...is a perfect correct structure.
The contrast in the last three answer choices here is an absolutely brilliant stroke on GMAC's part. This is a fabulous question.
Does all this make sense?
Mike