Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 00:10 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 00:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Dan
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Posts: 129
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,651
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dookie
Joined: 19 May 2004
Last visit: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Posts: 144
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,651
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well, I looked at this question again and I see what you mean Dookie. Let's say 15!, we have 1*15 but also 3 factors of 5 in there and a few more of 3. This means that by looking at the factors of 5, we will find the number of factors of 15. 942/5 = 188 is a good start. We know that it is at least 188. What we also need to see is numbers like 25,50,75,100 which each have 5^2 so 2 factors of 5. Next, we have 125 which has 3 factors of 5. And finally, we have 625 which has 4 factors of 5. For number of "extra" 5's we need to consider:
1- Where there is 2* 5's we have 942/25=37
2- Where there is 3*5's we have 942/125=7
3- Where there is 4*5's we have 942/625=1

Hence, max n is 188+37+7+1=233
User avatar
Dookie
Joined: 19 May 2004
Last visit: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Posts: 144
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice Paul,
I got lucky with my estimate
:lol:
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good calculation Paul !

I tried to apply the possessed method and got 928 :shock:
User avatar
Dan
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Posts: 129
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To add to Paul's, the number of factors of five is 233, but we also have to conisder the number of factors of 3, since to divide by 15, we need to take care of both 5s and 3s in there..taking 5s alone is not enough unless we consider 3s as well..

so 233 factors of 5s, and 467 factors of 3s. But since the latter makes number 942 not evenly divisible by 15^467, the answer is 233.

Take a smaller example of same question but where ...n such that 20! is divisible by 6^n.
Factors of 6 are 2 and 3. Do we consider number of factors of 2 or 3? We have to calculate both and see...unless there is a shortcut.
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,651
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reason I did not consider factors of 3 is because let's say in 15, there are 5*3s but only 3*5s. This means that in any given number, there are less factors of 5 than there are factors of 3. Hence, looking at factors of 5 will automatically take care for the factors of 3 because the former is more restrictive.
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just would like to add that the possessed method, for a reason i did not find, seems unuseful for this question while it is for 20! and 2^k for instance. I must admit I am a little bit puzzled with that point...
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,707
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,707
Kudos: 1,651
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
twixt
I just would like to add that the possessed method, for a reason i did not find, seems unuseful for this question while it is for 20! and 2^k for instance. I must admit I am a little bit puzzled with that point...

Are you sure the possessed method does not work? :lol: I found it quite useful and it DOES work. Here it is (remember to keep only the integer part):
942/5 = 188
188/5 = 37
37/5 = 7
7/5 = 1
Add it up: 188+37+7+1 = 233 :P
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you Paul !
My mistake : I used only the remainder but did (942-188)/15... I dont know why I always considered the substraction...



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
109740 posts