karimGMAT
To be a little more specific- right before I took the GMAT, I was able to achieve Q49 on two practice tests (one official MBA). Nonetheless, on the actual test I scored 43 then 46. Regarding verbal, towards the end of my prep I was able to occasionally reach V39. On my tests I got V38 and then V35. Altogether, my practice tests averaged in the high 600s, and I broke 700 once.
Your prep materials may have taught to the official practice tests. If so, you would score high on the official tests, but a bit lower on the actual GMAT.
In any case, your move for quant is to master one weaker area at a time to drive your expected quant score up point by point. To score in the upper 40s or 50s in quant, you have to be pretty solid in all areas of quant. If you have too many knowledge or skill gaps, the GMAT will likely uncover them.
For more on increasing your quant score, see this post.
How To Increase Your GMAT Quant ScoreQuote:
My main reason for postponing my studies for a tiny bit is the fact that I've burned through a lot of material. I've taken the six GMAT official practice tests and I've gone through a bunch of OG questions. I think that I should probably wait a month or two to defamiliarize myself with the material. I've taken all Kaplan and 7 Veritas tests as well.
Don't do that. Think about it. You are seeking to prepare by forgetting! Not the move. There is plenty of material to use. In fact, the idea that you should forget the material to learn is perhaps a clue indicating why you haven't hit your score goal. For instance, maybe you've been too focused on practicing rather than on mastering topics from the ground up.
Just move on to other materials and keep learning. By the time you have mastered more quant topics and strengthened your verbal skills, a month or two will have gone by anyway.
Regarding verbal, you could read this post to learn how to master verbal.
How to Score High on GMAT VerbalQuote:
In terms of input from the community, I would really appreciate a little diagnosis. I would love to know if any of what I've mentioned sounds misguided, or if I've done something noticeably wrong. I'm not sure I want to use a tutor in the future, and one thing on my mind is to try find a study buddy to make this content more approachable and intelligible. Perhaps a tutor was not the best route for me (and for others either)?
A tutor can be helpful, but unless you want to spend 200 hours with a tutor, you have to learn a lot on your own as well. Also, probabaly you have to practice way more than you have so far. At a certain point, preparing for the GMAT has to involve spending time working on you own and figuring things out. Too often, people get the impression that, if tutor explains a lot of concepts and practice questions for them, they'll be prepared for the test, but the thing is that you also have to learn to explain things yourself. After all, a key GMAT skill is skill in figuring things out on the fly.