EVALUATE THE ARGUMENT — GMAT FOCUS MASTER BOOKFAST IDENTIFICATION - Other than Typical stems: Which question would be most useful to determine whether...
Which issue would be most important to establish...
Which question should be answered before the conclusion can be accepted...
THE MOST COMMON EVALUATE PATTERNSPATTERN 6: FEASIBILITY
Argument:
New policy will reduce costs.
Gap:
Can it actually be implemented?
Prethink:
Can proposed action realistically happen?
Correct evaluate wording:
"Can the company implement the policy without significant operational disruptions?"
YES:
Supports.
NO:
Hurts.
PATTERN 7: MAGNITUDE
Argument:
Benefit exceeds cost.
Gap:
Need sizes.
Prethink:
How large are benefit and cost?
Correct evaluate wording:
"Will expected savings exceed implementation expenses?"
YES:
Good.
NO:
Bad.
PATTERN 8: NECESSARY ASSUMPTION CHECK
Argument:
New medicine will increase recovery rates.
Gap:
Maybe patients won't use it.
Prethink:
Necessary condition.
Correct evaluate wording:
"Will most patients actually take the medicine as prescribed?"
YES:
Argument survives.
NO:
Argument collapses.
PATTERN 9: GENERALIZATION
Argument:
One city succeeded with policy.
Therefore nation should adopt it.
Gap:
Similarity.
Prethink:
Are cases sufficiently similar?
Correct evaluate wording:
"Are conditions in the nation similar to those in the city?"
YES:
Stronger.
NO:
Weaker.
PATTERN 10: PREDICTION
Argument:
Trend today means future outcome.
Gap:
Will conditions stay same?
Prethink:
Will key factors continue?
Correct evaluate wording:
"Are the factors responsible for the current trend expected to continue?"
YES:
Supports prediction.
NO:
Weakens prediction.
6. PRETHINKING SYSTEM
Never try predicting exact answer.
Instead identify uncertainty category.
Ask:
What must be checked?
Categories:
Alternative cause?
Representative sample?
Comparable groups?
Direction of causation?
Prediction stability?
Feasibility?
Magnitude?
Necessary condition?
Your prethink should be one label only.
7. WHAT CORRECT ANSWERS USUALLY LOOK LIKE
Notice wording:
Whether...
Did...
Are...
Was...
Can...
To what extent...
How many...
How much...
Correct answers often look like investigations.
Examples:
"Whether customers knew..."
"Whether costs exceeded..."
"Did participants differ..."
"Were conditions similar..."
"Can company obtain..."
These sound like questions a researcher would ask.
8. TRAP ANSWERS
TRAP 1: IRRELEVANT INFORMATION
"How old is the CEO?"
Even if answered, conclusion unchanged.
Reject.
TRAP 2: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Provides context.
Doesn't affect conclusion.
Reject.
Example:
"When was company founded?"
TRAP 3: DETAIL HUNTING
Exact numbers not central.
Example:
"What was the precise cost of printer ink?"
May be unnecessary.
TRAP 4: ONE-SIDED
Only strengthens.
Doesn't evaluate.
Example:
"Did sales increase after campaign?"
Argument already says they did.
No evaluation.
TRAP 5: CONCLUSION RESTATEMENT
Example:
"Will profits increase?"
That's the conclusion itself.
Need to evaluate reasoning, not repeat conclusion.