Answer: A.**Why:** The doctor’s conclusion — that testing for *each* of the blood factors will correctly diagnose Disease X even in its early (most treatable) stage — depends on the unstated assumption that no early-stage patient lacks **all** of those factors. In other words, for testing every factor to guarantee detection, each case must have at least one of the factors present. Choice A says essentially that: there are few (if any) cases in which *none* of the factors is present in the early stage. That’s exactly what the argument needs.
Why the others fail (briefly):B is about cure rates, irrelevant to diagnosis.
C concerns factors in later stages — also irrelevant.
D rules out other non-mentioned factors, which the argument doesn’t require.
E is an overgeneralization (applies to any disease) and is much stronger than what the doctor needs; the doctor only needs that at least one of *these* factors appears in each early-stage case.