Kushchokhani
Braintree
The one exception that I know of where a verb-ing word, at the end of a clause, and separated by a comma, may modify the immediately preceding noun is the word "including". (though I'm not sure how important this exception is).
I don't think so this is an exception. I think you are referring to
this ques. Please refer
this post that explains that this is not an exception but just because we used modifiers before "including", it seems to be an exception.
KushchokhaniI believe you misunderstood the context in which
Braintree made the statement.
Braintree
The one exception that I know of where a verb-ing word, at the end of a clause, and separated by a comma, may modify the immediately preceding noun is the word "including". (though I'm not sure how important this exception is).
This usage that he* referenced in his statement is in situations when the word "including" is separated by comma and is used to provide examples for a preceding noun.
Ex. Most MBA colleges offer a variety of electives, including Finance, Marketing and Leadership.Here "including" though separated by comma modifies electives and gives examples for electives.
However, this is not
always the case (and the use of "may" in his statement justifies the next example) . (it's said - "there are very few rules in the world of Verbal"

)
Ex. Most MBA colleges offer a variety of electives for its students, including Finance, Marketing and Leadership.
In this case the word "including", still separated by comma, modifies electives and not students, the immediate preceding noun.
* -
Gender Neutral Pronoun