Last visit was: 13 May 2026, 09:39 It is currently 13 May 2026, 09:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mirhaque
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Last visit: 06 Aug 2008
Posts: 211
Own Kudos:
Posts: 211
Kudos: 260
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tkirk32
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Posts: 32
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dan
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Posts: 129
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cloudz9
Joined: 17 May 2005
Last visit: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 130
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mirhaque
don't agree with OA


for statement I to be true where x+y>13, there are several possibilities...however since we only need to worry about the lower ones, they are
0.59z, 0.68z ... (0.68z is greater than 2/3 so the only one to worry about is 0.59z
however this in itself doesn't provide enough information

for statement II to be true where x+z>14 again we only need to find the lowest possible numbers...
which are 0.6y9, 0.7y8 (0.7z8 is definitely greater than 2/3 so the only one to worry about is 0.6y9).
however this alone doesn't provide enough information

But if both statements are taken together...
from the first statement, the one number that was lower than 2/3 was 0.59z...however using the second statement this can be eliminated.
from the second statement the number that could be lower than 2/3 is 0.6y9....however from the first statement, the lowest value of y if x is 6 is 8...which makes the lowest possible value of 0.xyz to be 0.689 which is greater than 2/3
this gives us enough info to determine that given the two statements, 0.xyz will always be greater than 2/3

Thus, answer is C
User avatar
tkirk32
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Posts: 32
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
haha. For some reason I totaly ignored the ">" sign.
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 799
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) x+y>13
.95>2/3
.5914
zx>=6
Not knowing y
.612/3
Insufficient

Combined
x>=6
When x>6 .xyz>2/3
When x=6, y>7, .xyz>2/3
Sufficient

(C)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
110330 posts
GMAT Tutor
1922 posts