Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 0308:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 04
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare. - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
n2739178
Joined: 12 May 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: LBS '14 Oxford '14 Judge Sloan '14 INSEAD '14
GMAT Date: 10-22-2011
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
15 Jul 2011, 10:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi everyone,
I've realised recently that DS Inequalities are my number one area of weakness.
So I thought I'd start up a thread to discuss them.
What I'm hoping for is that people can post the different strategies and methods they use to attack these questions (with examples) - that way I can start to get a feel for how to approach these horrible, nasty questions.
I've bought Jeff Sackmann's Total GMAT Math and in that he says it is best to conceptualise these questions in your head, however I'm not so sure - isn't picking numbers better?
thanks
I've realised recently that DS Inequalities are my number one area of weakness.
So I thought I'd start up a thread to discuss them.
What I'm hoping for is that people can post the different strategies and methods they use to attack these questions (with examples) - that way I can start to get a feel for how to approach these horrible, nasty questions.
I've bought Jeff Sackmann's Total GMAT Math and in that he says it is best to conceptualise these questions in your head, however I'm not so sure - isn't picking numbers better?
thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
15 Jul 2011, 22:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
n2739178
For me the best way to solve inequalities is via substitution with boundary conditions.
30 Jul 2011, 02:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
I don't think there is one universal way of solving every DS inequalities question.
For some questions, assuming values and testing the conditions may be a good strategy. However, this is prone to some risk - you may forget to substitute a critical value (say, negatives) and check for it and therefore miss the correct answer choice.
On the other hand, solving an inequality algebraically can often give you the exact ranges you need to work with, besides the confidence that you haven't left anything out. On the other hand, this may be time consuming for some people, besides being very difficult to do on some questions.
I would suggest going over the rules for inequalities thoroughly so you are well equipped to handle a problem algebraically. If you can do the problem algebraically, and in a short amount of time, go for it. Else the number substitution approach is always possible.
For some questions, assuming values and testing the conditions may be a good strategy. However, this is prone to some risk - you may forget to substitute a critical value (say, negatives) and check for it and therefore miss the correct answer choice.
On the other hand, solving an inequality algebraically can often give you the exact ranges you need to work with, besides the confidence that you haven't left anything out. On the other hand, this may be time consuming for some people, besides being very difficult to do on some questions.
I would suggest going over the rules for inequalities thoroughly so you are well equipped to handle a problem algebraically. If you can do the problem algebraically, and in a short amount of time, go for it. Else the number substitution approach is always possible.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
