Last visit was: 19 Jul 2025, 13:08 It is currently 19 Jul 2025, 13:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ugimba
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Last visit: 15 Sep 2014
Posts: 329
Own Kudos:
4,860
 [20]
Given Kudos: 99
Posts: 329
Kudos: 4,860
 [20]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
jeeteshsingh
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Last visit: 03 Aug 2023
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
995
 [20]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 177
Kudos: 995
 [20]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
patedhav
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Last visit: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
62
 [1]
Posts: 58
Kudos: 62
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
roshanaslam
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Last visit: 25 Mar 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: masters in finance
 Q50  V48
GPA: ok this is the sad part
Posts: 22
Kudos: 153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
a simple to thing toremember here is that we usually eliminate 'which' because it refers to a noun preceding it. but remember that if a preposition precedes 'which', then this yardstick must not be applied
avatar
izaidi
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Last visit: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 30
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO:

Option d is also wrong because That is being used as a subordinator, and it is not clear what verb is being modified by it.

Its also the wrong subordinator! Because, As, For, or Since should be used.
avatar
roshanaslam
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Last visit: 25 Mar 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: masters in finance
 Q50  V48
GPA: ok this is the sad part
Posts: 22
Kudos: 153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no its not a subordinator!!
citizens of many countries are expressing concern THAT the enviromentmental damage caused by widespread release of green house gasses maybe impossible to reverse.
User avatar
nusmavrik
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2022
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Posts: 467
Kudos: 2,577
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could > can

can is used for general ability, could is used for possibility

I could pay my taxes. ----> Expresses possibility. If I have nothing else to do with the money, I might pay taxes.

ugimba
268. During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they canno longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could


Can some one explain this for me and why D is wrong as well...

was it "can" vs "could" decides the answer?

thanks.
avatar
izaidi
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Last visit: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 30
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
roshanaslam
no its not a subordinator!!
citizens of many countries are expressing concern THAT the enviromentmental damage caused by widespread release of green house gasses maybe impossible to reverse.

IMO:

Can the phrase "the enviromentmental damage caused by widespread release of green house gasses maybe impossible to reverse" stand as an independent clause? If so, then you have a run on sentence.

I think in the example you have cited, if THAT is not a subordinator then the sentence is a run on sentence.
avatar
roshanaslam
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Last visit: 25 Mar 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: masters in finance
 Q50  V48
GPA: ok this is the sad part
Posts: 22
Kudos: 153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
this sentence is perfectly correct. using essential modifier doesnt make a run on sentnce. although despite inspite of because make run on sentnces. who has told u 'that' is a subordinator? the clause before 'that' need not have a verb.
avatar
izaidi
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Last visit: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 30
Kudos: 48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
roshanaslam: MGMAT indicates that all relative pronouns can be used as subordinators (sorry for the late reply)
avatar
cluelesss
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Last visit: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 500 Q45 V16
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 500 Q45 V16
Posts: 40
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
went with D.. Because looked a better choice but didnt notice 'can' tense mistake :(
User avatar
thesfactor
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Last visit: 21 May 2011
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 65
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Got it wrong, the answer is E i guess...
Good to know that in general "which" must be preceded by a noun. However, if a preposition is attached before which as in this case "For Which..." then this case does not apply..
avatar
vaibhav123
Joined: 07 Nov 2011
Last visit: 28 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 10
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E it is ....in option D) "can" is wrongly used ...it should be past tense "could"
User avatar
BDSunDevil
Joined: 13 May 2011
Last visit: 24 Dec 2017
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Supply Chain, Logistics
WE 1: IT 1 Yr
WE 2: Supply Chain 5 Yrs
Posts: 141
Kudos: 532
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E. Which can be used because preposition is used before it.
avatar
Shiv2016
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2024
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 277
Posts: 517
Kudos: 207
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jeeteshsingh
268. During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they canno longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could

First Take - Can VS Could
Could is correct as the entire sentence is in the past tense and hence can would not be in sync....
Hence A, C, D are out...

B says that they could ... they is not sure whether it is Americans or Homes... hence B is out.. (an introduction of that after homes... makes homes a subject and hence creates this cconfusion)

E is a clear winner... which states.... homes for which they could....... and hence correct (if that is not present after homes... homes would be treated as an object and they would not refer to it in any form)


abhimahna and GMATNinja

I get really confused about the pronoun usage. The rule is that a pronoun must have only one antecedent and "it should make sense". But "they" in this question can logically refer to only AMERICANS because if we say "that homes could/can no longer afford payments...", it does not make sense.

Am I thinking in the wrong direction?
avatar
manishk30
Joined: 10 Jul 2016
Last visit: 14 Dec 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 32
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
patedhav
ugimba
268. During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they canno longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could


Can some one explain this for me and why D is wrong as well...

was it "can" vs "could" decides the answer?

thanks.


IMO E). Here we are talking about past and so it requires conditional past (could) and we are referring homes and so it requires which since "that" cannot be used for things.



'that' and 'which' both can be used for things. Difference is 'that' is used for general things but 'which' is used to refer specific things.
As in this case we are talking about those specific homes, 'which' is preferred here.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 771
Kudos: 414
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they canno longer afford monthly payments.
(A) that they can
(B) that they could
(C) on which they can
(D) because they can
(E) for which they could
this one is hard.
look at choice D.
I think, can/could is a problem in D but there is another problem
"because they can no longer pay monthly payment" is not clear. payment for what. the sentence should be
because they can no longer pay monthly payment for the homes"

in contrast, choice E is more logic. the ideas in choice E are connected logically

this is the reason why choice D is wrong.
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
108
 [2]
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 108
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since the original sentence included "resulted" which is past tense, we should also have a consistent past tense verb here ("could"). Therefore, eliminate A, C, and D.

since "that" come directly after "home", the "they" would refer to "homes", but homes cannot do the human action of affording mortgages. Therefore, B wrong.

Use of "for which":

Relevant example:

Incorrect: the restaurant I ate at.
Correct: the restaurant at which I ate.

Therefore, by plugging in E, we could translate the clause to home which they can no longer afford monthly payments for. Correct.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,456
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,456
Kudos: 955
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts