Bunuel
Editorial: It is clear that what is called “health education” is usually propaganda rather than education. Propaganda and education are never the same thing. The former is nothing but an attempt to influence behavior through the repetition of simplistic slogans, whereas the latter never involves such a method. Though education does attempt to influence behavior, it does so by offering information in all its complexity, leaving it up to the individual to decide how to act on that information. Sadly, however, propaganda is much more successful than education.
The conclusion drawn by the editorial follows logically if it is assumed that what is called “health education” usually
(A) does not leave it up to the individual to decide how to act on information
(B) does not offer information in all its complexity
(C) does not involve the repetition of simplistic slogans
(D) attempts to influence behavior solely by repeating simplistic slogans
(E) is very successful in influencing people’s behavior
EXPLANATION FROM Fox LSAT
Here, we are asked to prove the argument’s conclusion. That conclusion is, “It is clear that what is called ‘health education’ is usually propaganda rather than education.” The word “usually” means “more often than not,” or “most of the time.” The important evidence offered in support of this conclusion is 1) propaganda and education are never the same thing, 2) propaganda is nothing but an attempt to influence behavior through the repetition of simplistic slogans, 3) education never involves such a method, and 4) education offers information in all its complexity, leaving it up to the individual to decide. This evidence doesn’t prove the author’s conclusion, because it offers no information about health education at all.
The question asks us to make the conclusion “follow logically” from the given evidence, plus one more piece of evidence of our choosing. This is a Sufficient Assumption question. It is very important to answer this type of question before looking at the answer choices. We’re hiring an expert witness; let’s figure out what we want that expert to say before we start interviewing candidates.
We need our expert to connect the evidence that we already have to the conclusion that we want. My prediction here is, “Health education usually (or always) attempts to influence behavior through the repetition of simplistic slogans.” If this were true, it would directly connect health education to the evidence we already have about propaganda.
A) If this is true, then health education is not “education.” But that doesn’t prove it’s propaganda. This is close, but I want to go all the way to propaganda.
B) Exact same deal as A. If this is true, then health education is not “education,” but that
doesn’t prove it’s propaganda. Note here: If both A and B seem to do exactly the same thing, then neither of them can be the correct answer, because there can be only
one correct answer.
C) This would weaken the idea that health education is propaganda. I wanted to strengthen that idea.
D) This is almost exactly what we predicted. I like it.
E) Nah. It’s possible that both education and propaganda are very successful at influencing behavior. Otherwise what would be the point of either one? This doesn’t prove that health education is propaganda. But D did.
So D is our answer.