Last visit was: 03 Jun 2026, 03:24 It is currently 03 Jun 2026, 03:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Matador
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Last visit: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Posts: 75
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
M8
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Last visit: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Location: Europe
Posts: 193
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Professor
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 562
Own Kudos:
Posts: 562
Kudos: 187
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chiragr
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Last visit: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 327
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Matador
Edmund works at a constant rate and assembles 18 clocks in 3 hours. How much less time would be needed to assemble the same number of clocks if Edmund and Heinrich were working simultaneously?

1) Both Edmund and Heinrich assemble the same number of clocks every hour.

2) It takes Edmund and Heinrich, working simultaneously, half as long to assemble the clocks as it takes Heinrich working alone.


Can somebody please explain statement 2 to me?? I.e., how would I check whether statement 2 is sufficient?


One simple way to look at 2nd is if Edmund and Heinrich work simultaniously they will finish 18 clock(work) in 1.5 hour

and we know edmund takes 3 hour for 18 clock so required answer is 1.5 hour, so second is sufficient.

--------------------------------------------------------
Other way is to understand concept, how to derive and use euqation.

Work = Rate * Time

We = Re*Te
Wh = Rh*Th

total work Wt= Rt*Tt

Normally in such question work is same so We=Wh = Wt

More over when two people work togather their rate will add up so..
Rt= Re+Rh
Wt/Tt = Wh/Th+We/Te

as We=Wh=Wt
1/Tt = 1/Te + 1/Th

and lot of time we take unit work so
1= RtTt so
Rt=1/Tt = 1/[1/Te + 1/Th]

Rt = Th*Te/(Th+Te)

I above two equation frequently to solve many problems.
User avatar
remgeo
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Last visit: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 263
Own Kudos:
Location: London
Posts: 263
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll go with A.

2 is not sufficient because we know only Edmund's working pattern, not Heinrisch's.
User avatar
jcgoodchild
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Last visit: 02 May 2006
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 50
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Definitely D.

We must remember the equation that work = rate * time. When multiple people work together, we add their rates.


Statement 1: From this we know that their rates are equal. Therefore each has a clock building rate of 18/3 clocks per hour. Add, we get 12 clocks per hour. To build 18 clocks would take 1.5 hours, which is 1.5 hours less.


Statement 2: Remembering that we add the respective rates of work, we know that if the combined rate produces 18 clocks in 1.5 hours, the combined rate is 18/1.5, or 36/3, OR 12. We know Edmund's rate to be 18/3, so subtracting that from 36/3, we know that Heinrich's rate must be 18/3 as well.
User avatar
Matador
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Last visit: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Posts: 75
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is D.

See explanations above.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
111042 posts