GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Jun 2018, 08:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 261
Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2009, 04:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics of linguistic systems: however, they can be used together to achieve usefulness and reliability in communication. If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word. However, if the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.
If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) Efficiency causes a spoken language to be useful and redundancy causes it to be reliable.
(B) Neither efficiency nor redundancy can be completely achieved in spoken language.
(C) If a spoken language were completely redundant, then it could not be useful.
(D) If the human auditory system were a perfect receptor of sounds, then every permutation of language sounds would be an understandable word.
(E) If the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then a spoken language cannot be completely efficient.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

"CEO in making"

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 353
Location: Turkey
Schools: UPenn, UMich, HKS, UCB, Chicago
Re: LSAT - Efficiency [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2009, 04:18
IMO D.
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 683
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: LSAT - Efficiency [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2009, 07:11
IMO E.

If the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then it is not true that every possible permutation of a spoken language’s basic language sounds can be an understandable word.

If a spoken language is completely efficient, then every possible permutation of its basic language sounds can be an understandable word
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 349
Location: PDX
Re: LSAT - Efficiency [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2009, 08:22
Another vote for E

(A) Efficiency causes a spoken language to be useful and redundancy causes it to be reliable.
Can't be deduced
(B) Neither efficiency nor redundancy can be completely achieved in spoken language.
No proof of this what so ever
(C) If a spoken language were completely redundant, then it could not be useful.
Again no mention of redundancy
(D) If the human auditory system were a perfect receptor of sounds, then every permutation of language sounds would be an understandable word.
This is converse of what's stated in the premise. So not true
(E) If the human auditory system is an imperfect receptor of sounds, then a spoken language cannot be completely efficient.
Only option that makes sense.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead

Re: LSAT - Efficiency   [#permalink] 25 Jun 2009, 08:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Efficiency and redundancy are contradictory characteristics

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.