GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Aug 2018, 00:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 175
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2009, 09:05
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

74% (00:43) correct 26% (00:45) wrong based on 172 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Please help me with this SC...

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

Attachments

SC04.jpg
SC04.jpg [ 53.95 KiB | Viewed 7219 times ]

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2009, 13:36
1
Since the sentence is comparing the rising of employment costs, you need "they did" in the comparison. If it were just employment costs, then you could use "lower than" ..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 49
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2009, 06:46
badgerboy wrote:
Since the sentence is comparing the rising of employment costs, you need "they did" in the comparison. If it were just employment costs, then you could use "lower than" ..


Why is less than considered. Less is used for uncountable words right? Lower is used for countable. Rising costs will be a number. And hence countable so shouldnt it be lower than they were? Please explain.. why each answer is wrong.
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 539
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2009, 08:03
I dont think Employments costs is countable here but still not sure
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 46
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2009, 12:32
1
Here 'less" is modifying 'rose' and not employment costs.because costs have risen by 2.8 %.so costs can not be lower

this eliminates D and E.

B is wrong because of It


C is wrong because less than they were.here were is modifying employment costs

which is wrong.


So A is the right answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 92
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2010, 11:23
Hi,
As explained by hrish88, 'less' modifies rose, but how is the subject plural?
In option A, we are using 'less than they' which means 'rose' should be a plural subject.
If subject is singular, then we should use 'it' instead.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 854
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2010, 01:29
2
Can you count years? I can count my birthday LOL

But in grammar "25 years" is uncountable. e.g Less than 35 years after the release of African honeybees outside Sao Paulo, Brazil, their descendants, had migrated as far north as southern Texas.

Similarly "1000 dollars" is uncountable. I have [less / fewer] than 1000 dollars ----> less

"10 hours" are uncountable

Money is uncountable e.g. How ......... money do you have? ----> much

Hope that answers this question!
RaviChandra wrote:
I dont think Employments costs is countable here but still not sure
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2012, 07:13
Although I don't think it is the relevant issue in this one, "employment costs" might be either countable or uncountable, depending on the context. You could count the various components (employment costs = hiring + training + salary + benefits + etc.). On the other hand, you could lump all of these costs into one amount, which would be uncountable.

Uncountable is probably the intended meaning here, as it says the costs "rose" not "increased in number."

Either "less" or "lower" could work with an uncountable quantity, so what do we really need to know about these words?
--"less" is a comparative that means "smaller in size, amount, degree, etc."
--"lower" is a comparative that is the opposite of higher.

I think the relevant amount is not the "employment costs" but the percent by which the costs rose. I think "less than" more clearly conveys the idea that employment costs rose 2.8% in the year ending in September, while employment costs rose <2.8% in the year ending in June.

If you wanted to use "lower than" correctly, you would need a noun in the second part of the comparison (e.g. "2.8% is lower than the percent for last quarter). Both (D) and (E) can be eliminated on this basis. (D) has no noun in the second part of the comparison. (E) has "they" = costs, which is the wrong noun, in the second part of the comparison.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4527
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 May 2017, 12:06
1
Top Contributor
One thing to remember: Except in the case of money when it is taken as a quantum of money or a distance that is taken as one length of distance or time reference that is taken as a quantity of time( in spite of the fact, they invariably involve plural words), in all other cases plural nouns are considered countable.
Eg: 100 dollars is too much price for a trouser.
Note the plural word dollars being taken, as singular, however, 'I gave 9 ten dollar bills for the trouser' is considered plural because you are able to count each ten-dollar bill.
2. 26 miles and 195 feet is the distance of a marathon.
3. Four hours is a long time for an air travel from Chennai to Delhi.

'Costs' in the given case is countable. You see there are so many types of employment costs such as housing allowance, travel allowance, hospital care, subsided food etc, etc. Second, it is now countable, lower is the more appropriate comparator than less. By this reckoning, we may dislodge A, B, and C in one stroke.

However, the crux of the issue is that of a proper comparison. Let's take the verb 'rose'. Did the employments costs do anything to raise the percentage? No, the costs rose as a matter of a natural phenomenon. Therefore, there is no deliberate action involved in the comparison. You will use an action verb in comparisons in the second arm only when there is an equally comparable action in the first arm. The actual sentence with the proper comparison is: Employment costs rose 2.8% in the 12 months ended September, slightly less than (employment costs rose) in the year ended in the previous quarter. Here we can elide employment costs rose in the second arm since a verbatim version is present in the first arm.
They 'were' in E does not describe the intent of employment costs rose as stated in the first arm. Hence, E is wrong

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Re: Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ... &nbs [#permalink] 04 May 2017, 12:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months ...

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.