Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sept. 6, 9:30am-12:30pm EST
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Oct. 13, 2026 - Jan. 7, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
I started studying for the GMAT test late last week and decided to start right off the bat with a practice CAT, as you may imagine this didn't go so well as I was not even familiar with the types of questions I would be seeing. Needless to say, I didn't do very well and only scored a 530. I decided to look over the areas that I did poorly on and with an improved understanding of the test, took at second CAT 3 days later and scored a 610. The surprising thing for me was that on both tests my quant scores were significantly below my verbal scores. This is very surprising to me as I have a master's degree in mechanical engineering and consider myself to be relatively proficient with math.
My question is, is it common for engineers to maybe "miss the point" on the quant section? Is there anyone who has had a similar problem?
One thing I have found is that they are absolutely testing your thinking process and it is clear that they are not intending for you to solve all of the questions in a traditional manner.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A small tip would be to see if there are "easier" paths to solving the questions. I'm teaching someone from a quant heavy background now, for example, who is finding value even on EASY questions in that regard. It's not only about getting something correct on an exam that is somewhat like a marathon - it can be helpful to get things correct in an efficient way.
I started studying for the GMAT test late last week and decided to start right off the bat with a practice CAT, as you may imagine this didn't go so well as I was not even familiar with the types of questions I would be seeing. Needless to say, I didn't do very well and only scored a 530. I decided to look over the areas that I did poorly on and with an improved understanding of the test, took at second CAT 3 days later and scored a 610. The surprising thing for me was that on both tests my quant scores were significantly below my verbal scores. This is very surprising to me as I have a master's degree in mechanical engineering and consider myself to be relatively proficient with math.
My question is, is it common for engineers to maybe "miss the point" on the quant section? Is there anyone who has had a similar problem?
One thing I have found is that they are absolutely testing your thinking process and it is clear that they are not intending for you to solve all of the questions in a traditional manner.
Show more
Yeah you're kinda hitting the nail on the head with that last sentence, there. This test isn't *really* a math test... it's a reasoning test that uses math. If they wanted to know how good at math you were, they'd test calculus and all that stuff you learned for you engineering degree. But that's not really the point.
Take a look, for instance, at the 'perfect' DS question in my signature. It's not math at all, really, but it really gets at what is often happening in quant. It should also be noted that, in many ways, the GMAT is a trap answer test...
Check out the 'studying for quant starter kit' link in my email, also. It leads to a thread that has hours of free video that will help you get a grasp on the quant in the way the GMAT really rewards.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.