Hi Rosebm,
Although I don’t have much information regarding how you studied for your GMAT, I’m happy to provide some general advice based on the information in your ESR.
Since verbal is your weakest topic, let’s start with that. Of the three verbal topics, you are weakest in Critical Reasoning, right? Since you scored in the 43rd percentile in CR, it’s clear that your CR score is putting a damper on your overall verbal score. It’s also clear that you lack some foundational skills necessary for a high CR score. Thus, you may need to spend some time relearning the foundational principles of each Critical Reasoning topic. For instance, do you know the importance of an assumption within an argument? Can you easily spot a conclusion? Do you know how to resolve a paradox? Do you know how to properly evaluate cause and effect? Do you know how to properly weaken or strengthen an argument? These are just a few examples; you really need to take a deep dive into the individual Critical Reasoning topics such that you develop the necessary skills to properly attack any Critical Reasoning questions that you encounter.
As you learn each Critical Reasoning problem type, do focused practice so that you can track your skill in answering each type. If, for example, you incorrectly answered a Weaken the Argument question, ask yourself why. Did you make a careless mistake? Did you not recognize the specific question type? Were you doing too much analysis in your head? Did you skip over a keyword in an answer choice? You must thoroughly analyze your mistakes and seek to turn weaknesses into strengths by focusing on the question types you dread seeing and the questions you take a long time to answer correctly.
Another major mistake that people make when training for CR is that they do practice questions too fast. To get Critical Reasoning questions correct, you have to see exactly what is going on in the passages and answer choices, and you likely won't learn to do so by spending a few minutes per question. At this stage of your training, you may need to spend even fifteen minutes per question, learning to see what there is to see. Here is a way to look at this process:
If you get a new job in a field in which you are not experienced, you may not be as fast as the other people working with you, but you know you have a job to do. So, what do you do? You do the job correctly, if not as quickly as those around you, and you make sure that you learn all the angles so that you do the job well. Rushing through the job and doing it incorrectly would not make sense. As you gain more experience, you learn to do the same job more quickly.
Think of Critical Reasoning questions similarly. Is your job to get through questions quickly? Not really. Your job is to get correct answers. So, first you have to learn to get correct answers, at least 10 to 15 in a row consistently, and more in a row would be better. If doing so takes fifteen minutes, then so be it. That is what it takes for you to do your job. Only after you have learned to get correct answers consistently should you work on speeding up. Working quickly but not doing your job is useless. Better to work slowly and learn to do your job well. You can be sure that with experience you will learn to speed up, and then you will still be doing your job well, i.e., getting correct answers consistently.
Finally, a vital aspect of getting correct answers to Critical Reasoning questions is noticing the key differences between trap choices and correct answers. Trap choices may sound temptingly correct, but the logic of what a trap choice says simply doesn't fit what the question is asking you to find. So, to get correct answers, learn to see the key differences between trap choices and correct answers.
For quant, although a Q47 is a pretty great quant score, you could spend some time improving your skills in that topic to try to increase your quant score to a 49+. Based on your ESR, Number Properties appears to be a clear weakness. With some focused Number Properties practice, you should be able to find and fix weaknesses in that topic. Start by practicing 50 or more questions just from Number Properties: LCM, GCF, units digit patterns, divisibility, remainders, etc. As you do such practice, do a thorough analysis of each question that you don't get right. If you got a remainder question wrong, ask yourself why. Did you make a careless mistake? Did you not properly apply the remainder formula? Was there a concept you did not understand in the question? By carefully analyzing your mistakes, you will be able to efficiently fix your weaknesses and in turn improve your GMAT quant skills. Number Properties is just one example; you can follow this method for other quant topics.
I realize that you have only one month until your next exam, so please reach out to me directly if you have any further questions.
You also may find it helpful to read this article about
how to score a 700+ on the GMAT.
Let’s do this!!