navderm
MartyTargetTestPrep
Hi navederm.
What resources have you used to prepare for SC and what have you done to prepare for SC?
The reason I'm asking is that, since you are having trouble with Communication, i.e., meaning, and with "complicated" sentences, I'm wondering what you have done to learn about the construction of sentences and in particular about how the various types of modifiers function in sentences.
Well, I have used a bunch of them, e-gmat, veritas, ttp, and then bunch of questions from gmatclub 600-800 range. Looking at the lectures again doesn't help, i feel i know everything. Doing questions is good but I think when I am at the stress of test, it doesn't go as planned.
Also, I personally find SC a drag. It's, to me, useless and a waste of time. I feel I just have to do it because of GMAT. Otherwise, unlike CR, Quant, RC, it's just not applicable. May be that is why I am not doing well.
However, I am stuck because of it and I need to concentrate on it for next 2 weeks and get better, so any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Regarding SC being "useless," actually many people find that their writing gets tuned up through their preparation for SC. I know mine has. So, that might be something to keep in mind if it helps.
Regarding how to proceed, if you still have a TTP subscription, you might want to review the Introduction to SC, for some tips on how to approach the questions; the Sentence Structure Chapter, for some insights regarding complex sentence structures; and the Modifiers chapter, which is the chapter that is most related to meaning conveyed by sentences.
I realize that you feel that you have the concepts down, but if you're having trouble analyzing complex sentences under pressure, then I have to wonder how clear you are about sentence structure and modifiers.
On another note, something that could be tripping you up is things that you "learned." In other words, some ideas or strategies that you picked up from some of the resources you used may not actually work.
For instance, the concept of "intended meaning" is basically a myth. So, if you are applying that concept when answering SC questions, you are sabotaging your performance by doing what someone who supposedly knows what to do told you to do.
Overall, any gimmicky strategies that you have learned will not work, and I have seen people's scores decrease precipitously as they have "learned" strategies for SC.
With that in mind, I think you likely have to review modifiers and then approach SC sentence versions more holistically. Probably, to improve your skill in the communication aspect of SC, you need to work on reading the sentence versions from beginning to end to determine what they convey and how effectively they convey it.
You have to ask question such as the following:
Is the meaning conveyed logical?
Is is clear?
What does this sentence convey if I read it literally?
Also, you need to do your practice untimed, spending easily 15 minutes or more on each SC question you see and carefully analyzing each choice to develop (1) skill in seeing what the issues are and (2) skill in clearly articulating what they are.
In other words, in analyzing SC questions, you need to be able to come up with explanations as clear and thorough as the SC explanations in the TTP course.
If you practice in that way, your SC skills and your writing skills are sure to improve, and you won't be wasting your time, because you'll not only hit your score goal but also develop writing skills and analytical skills that will serve you well going forward.