I'm getting something else entirely, I get 65.
Logic (similar to the methodology used to solve assuming a,b,c were all prime):
I found 4 types of a,b,c combos to divide the 6 #'s (1,2,3,5,7,11), being careful with the 1 value, because I think it can create complications with the methodology at the very end of my response.
1.) 1, product of three #'s, product of two #'s (e.g. {1,30,77})
1*5C3*2C2 = 1*10*1 = 10
2.) 1, product of four #'s, one remaining # (e.g. {1,210,11})
1*5C4*1C1 = 1*5*1 = 5
3.) product of three #'s, one remaining #, one remaining # (e.g. {30, 7, 11})
5C3*2C1*1C1 = 10*2*1 = 20
4.) product of two #'s, product of two #'s, one remaining # (e.g. {30, 7, 11})
5C2*3C2*1C1 = 10*3*1 = 30
10 + 5 + 20 + 30 = 65
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I tried doing it as though it was just 6 #'s (see below work) and the 1 value, I believe, messes things up.
product of 4#'s * 1# * 1# = 6C4*2C1*1C1 = 15*2*1 = 30
product of 3#'s * product of 2#'s * 1# = 6C3*3C2*1C1 = 20*3*1 = 60
product of 2#'s * product of 2#'s * product of 2#'s = 6C2 * 4C2 * 2C2 = 15*6*1 = 90
30 + 60 + 90 = 180