It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 03:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1604
For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 07:25
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:06) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.

(A) For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.
(B) For starters, the new treaty is nor easier to understand than its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.
(C) For starters, the new treaty is not easier to understand than its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.
(D) For starters, the new treaty is no easier to understand than for its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.
(E) For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than for its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 07:32
A it is. Testing idom "neither...nor". E is not good because it illogically says that the treaty's predecessors have some kind of understanding
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1604
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 07:51
The problem is not so obvious and pretty much weird. I spent an hour truying to invent it. A hint: look for a correct comparison.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245
Location: INDIA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 10:03
my ans wud b...C

the comparision here is between ''two '' Different ''things'' it should be either '' neither is the new treaty easier than its predecessors to understand nor is it too difficlut to comprehend'' here the comparision is between the treaty in its difficulty to understand and in its easier comprehension...

but the sentnce here talks about two things one: the new TREATY... two- new institutional arangements...

the snetence here means soem thing like'' neither the new treaty nor the new Institutional arrangementz are easier to understand than their predecessors were '... and the choice A and B confuse us ... D and E use ''for'' and so get it incorrect...

only C comes close ... but I guess thats a bit confusing...

let me know If I was right in my ''shot'' ...hahah

hope that helps!

Have fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574
Location: San Jose, CA
Re: SC: new treaty [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 10:15
I will go with E on this one

reason1: neither-nor
reason2: For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than for its predecessors
- correct comparison
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 10:18
A good question. I would go with D
if correct exp will follow.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 83
Re: SC: new treaty [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 10:22
stolyar wrote:
For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.

(E) For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand than for its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements.


For the comparison purpose, I will go with E.

Using two/three split strategy, A and E will remain. and logically E explain for who the treaty is easier.

Correct me if I am mistaken :-D .
_________________

-Genius is one percent inspiration, and ninety-nine percent perspiration.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 11:25
C it is.

this was a hard one... :shh
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 844
Location: Hyderabad
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 11:40
My FA is A

the comparision here is between the new treaty and the institutional arrangements and hence between A and E I choose A.

E will not make sense, even if the comparision were to be between the Starters and the people who precede the starters
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 12:31
After looking really closely [with Stolyar you always have to] I choose C.

correct comparison: new treaty vs its predecessors [older treaty]
in other words: new treaty is just as difficult to understand as all the previous ones

what confused me most is the use of the phrase 'for starters' at the beginning of the sentence. At first, I thought the phrase meant 'firstly', but then I figured out that if I interpreted it to mean 'for beginners' the sentence makes more sense.
_________________

Searching for an answer...

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 13:30
Alright, I assumed things to fast here. I thought "idiom" so let's pick the right one! But if Stoylar spent over an hour to devise this cunning scheme, then it may be worth re-analyzing this one :computer

A) "neither... nor" is used as an enumeration of adjectives/adverbs/verbs/pronouns pertaining to a subject and usually limited to 2 alternatives.
Ex: The book is neither black nor white
Ex: I am neither mad nor angry at you
Ex: This pen is neither his nor mine

In A:
For starters,
the new treaty is neither easier to understand than its predecessors,
nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements

Here, the subject is "new treaty"
The enumeration starts with "easier to understand" but then suddenly switch the subject to "new institutional arrangements". The enumeration is flawed.

C must be it.
D has the same flaw as E does as it erroneously compares the treaty's understanding to the treaty's predecessors.
:done
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1604
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 22:53
kpadma wrote:
A good question. I would go with D
if correct exp will follow.


Yes, it is D. A NEITHER-NOR construction is not the case here. The case is an inversion.

the new treaty is NO EASIER to understand..., NOR ARE the new institutional arrangements.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2004, 23:02
Pardon me Stoylar but I'm somewhat distraught by choice D as answer.

For starters, the new treaty is no easier to understand than for its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements

Can you tell me what "its" refers to? Does it refer to "new treaty"? If you meant to say "starters' predecessors", then should not "its" be interchanged for "their"?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2004, 02:12
I think its refer to "new treaty", and is correctly used.
(Any way I also got this one wrong, picked (A))

Tough one I guess!! :ouch
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1604
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2004, 02:29
Paul wrote:
Pardon me Stoylar but I'm somewhat distraught by choice D as answer.

For starters, the new treaty is no easier to understand than for its predecessors, nor, overall, are the new institutional arrangements

Can you tell me what "its" refers to? Does it refer to "new treaty"? If you meant to say "starters' predecessors", then should not "its" be interchanged for "their"?


Agree. ITS should read THEIR. Forgive me people. :stupid2
  [#permalink] 30 Jun 2004, 02:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic #Top 150 SC: The preliminary agreement to what was to be the Treaty of souvik101990 0 18 Sep 2015, 11:27
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often swatirpr 0 25 Oct 2014, 20:31
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often hogann 11 06 Apr 2011, 09:55
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often x97agarwal 3 12 Aug 2008, 06:21
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often bsd_lover 8 11 May 2008, 17:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For starters, the new treaty is neither easier to understand

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.