Last visit was: 03 Jun 2026, 01:54 It is currently 03 Jun 2026, 01:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatcracker2010
Joined: 13 May 2010
Last visit: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 80
Kudos: 943
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bibha
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Last visit: 06 Jan 2011
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 95
Kudos: 1,239
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatcracker2010
Joined: 13 May 2010
Last visit: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 80
Kudos: 943
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sjayasa
Joined: 02 May 2010
Last visit: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Schools:IU, UT Dallas, Univ of Georgia, Univ of Arkansas, Miami University
WE 1: 5.5 Yrs IT
Posts: 31
Kudos: 196
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C. My explanation below;

The claim made by Sandwich queen is that the use of feelight (the new oil) hurt sales of its Cold Cats (a specific delicacy in the restaurant). Subsequently, the argument also states that this claim is incorrect because the restaurant sold 10% more Cold Cats last year than in the previous year (Note that this is the argument against the claim made by Sandwish queen. We have been asked to identify which one of the options supports this)

A. Sandwich queen enjoys higher profit margins on its Soft Drinks than it does on Cold cats. - Irrelevant
B. Sandwich queen's customers prefer the taste of Cold cats cooked in corn oil to Cold cats cooked in low fat oil. - Supports the claim and not the argument against the claim.
C. Total sales of all foods at Sandwich queen's locations increased by less than 10 percent last year. - Correct. (This option clearly mentions the increase in sales of all foods, Cold cats being one of them).
D. The number of customers that visited Sandwich queen locations was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before. - Irrelevant (The increase in number of customers does not tell us anything about the increase in sales of cold cats. For this to support the argument against Sandwish's claim, we will have to make an additional assumption here that the increase in the number of customers resulted in more consumption of Cold cats)
E. The year before last, Sandwich queen experienced a 20 percent increase in Cold cats sales over the previous year. Irrelevant (What happened the year before last doesn't help. We are interested only in, what happened last year in comparison with the year before last).

Please let me know if that doesn't make sense.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7394 posts
643 posts