Argument Breakdown:
First Boldface Statement: "General Autos sold a record number of automobiles last year."
This is a fact about the past, not a prediction or an objection. It sets the context for the discussion but does not argue against the conclusion.
Second Boldface Statement: "Clearly, it can be concluded that the incremental number of automobiles sold this year will fall short of last year's record."
This is the main conclusion of the argument.
Evaluating Answer Choices:
(A) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is that main conclusion.
Incorrect. The first statement is not a prediction; it's a factual statement about past sales.
(B) The first is a prediction that, if accurate, would provide support for the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support that main conclusion.
Incorrect. The first is not a prediction, and the second is the main conclusion, not a supporting conclusion.
(C) The first is an objection that the argument rejects; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
Incorrect. The first statement is not an objection—it is a neutral fact.
(D) The first is an objection that the argument rejects; the second presents a conclusion that could be drawn if that objection were allowed to stand.
Incorrect. Again, the first is not an objection, and the second is the main conclusion, not a conditional conclusion.
(E) The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a claim advanced in support of the main conclusion of the argument.
Correct. The first statement (last year’s record sales) supports the idea that another record might be possible. However, the argument opposes this position by arguing that sales will actually fall short. The second boldface supports the argument's conclusion.
Final Answer:
(E)