Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 4 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we tackle the most intimidating CR question type: Boldface & "Legalese" questions. If you've ever stared at an answer choice that reads, "The first is a consideration introduced to counter a position that...
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Please see the attachment. From the picture, can we ever assume that x = 1/2y as if the triangle is inscribed in the circle and point D is the "center" of the triangle, and, possibly, of that "imaginary" circle. Or in other words, when dealing with the angles (such as in the example provided) can we ever assume that triangle is circumscribable and draw inferences based on that? Would your answer be the same if we were told that point D is the "center" of the triangle...?
This question was inspired by the OG12 DS 140. I wondering about different possibilities regarding the situation.
Share your thoughts please.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
If this picture appeared in a DS question, then the only thing we can "trust" is that we're dealing with a triangle. We don't know if it's equilateral and we don't know if point D is the center.
Please see the attachment. From the picture, can we ever assume that x = 1/2y as if the triangle is inscribed in the circle and point D is the "center" of the triangle, and, possibly, of that "imaginary" circle. Or in other words, when dealing with the angles (such as in the example provided) can we ever assume that triangle is circumscribable and draw inferences based on that? Would your answer be the same if we were told that point D is the "center" of the triangle...?
This question was inspired by the OG12 DS 140. I wondering about different possibilities regarding the situation.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.