Official Explanation : -
Argument ConstructionSituation
The argument presents a Generalization that more viewers equals greater revenue, and the Situation of a specific show, Starlight: it’s the network’s most popular show, but its net profitability (revenue minus costs) is below average and declining due to high and rising production costs.
Reasoning
What additional factor would support the idea that Starlight contributes more to profits than its net profitability would suggest? The Judgment, or conclusion, is that VNT’s profits would be better protected by retaining Starlight than by replacing it with an average show. This judgment seems counterintuitive, as Starlight’s profitability is low and falling. To provide the strongest reason that the judgment is well-founded, we need to find a factor that demonstrates Starlight contributes significantly to VNT’s overall profits in a way that is not captured by looking solely at Starlight’s individual net income. In other words, we need to show that Starlight generates a positive externality (a benefit to other shows) that would be lost if the show were replaced by an average performer.
A. General network data is irrelevant to the specific comparison between keeping Starlight and replacing it with an average show.
B. Correct. This provides the necessary positive externality. If Starlight (VNT’s most popular show) significantly boosts the viewership of the shows surrounding it, then replacing Starlight with an average show would cause a sharp drop in viewership—and thus in advertising revenue—for two or more adjacent shows. This potential massive loss in revenue across the entire prime-time lineup makes the retention of the less profitable Starlight a much better strategy for protecting overall VNT profits.
C. This fact merely reinforces the problem stated in the Situation section, explaining why the show’s profitability is low. It does not provide a reason why retaining the show is the better financial decision.
D. This fact merely suggests that a show similar to Starlight failed in a different time slot, which might discourage replacement with a similar show but does not explain the unique, positive value of retaining the current Starlight in its current time slot.
E. This fact reinforces the idea that the show’s low profitability is permanent, which makes the decision to retain it less logical. It doesn’t offer a hidden benefit that justifies retention.