Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 14:46 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 14:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 28 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,853
Own Kudos:
7,812
 [24]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,853
Kudos: 7,812
 [24]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,696
Own Kudos:
5,212
 [4]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,696
Kudos: 5,212
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,353
Own Kudos:
705
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,658
Posts: 1,353
Kudos: 705
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
eddo124
Joined: 02 Dec 2021
Last visit: 30 Apr 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
may I ask what it means by "spreading the 2 factors apart" ? Thanks

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
shivaniilall
Joined: 22 Nov 2021
Last visit: 13 Feb 2024
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 320
Location: India
Posts: 27
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fdambro294
I approached the question from the perspective of trying to logically analyze each Answer Choice.

1st). Visualizing the Line and figuring out what the question is asking

For the Line to pass through Point (3 , 48) AND cross both the +Pos. X-Axis and +Pos. Y-Axis, the Line must be a downward sloping line

Further, Point P is the X intercept of the line and Point Q is the Y Intercept of the line. What the question is essentially asking us to do is MINIMIZE the Product of the (X Intercept Value) * (Y Intercept Value) = ?

The 1st thing to notice is that since the Downward Sloping Line crosses through Point (3 , 48), the point at which the line crosses the Y Axis MUST be greater than > +48. The Y-Intercept can NOT be at Q = (0 , 48).

Further, if the line WERE to cross the X-Axis at P = (3, 0), the only way the line would intersect Point (3 , 48) is if the line was a vertical line with an equation of: X = 3

However, this is not possible because the vertical line X = 3 will never cross the (+)Pos. Y Axis at Point Q. Also, we already established that the Line must be Downward Sloping and that the Y Intercept at Point Q must be greater than > 48

Therefore, the X-Intercept at Point P must be greater than > 3

From these observations, we can say the following:

(OP) * (PQ) > (48) * (3)

(OP) * (PQ) > 144

This eliminates answers A and B right off the bat.


For Answer C = 198:

There are 12 Total Factors of 198, which gives us 6 (+) Pos. Factor Pairs of Integers that multiply to 198.

While the problem does not say we must have integer values of P and Q, it is a good place to start to see which values are possible given the constraints we found.

The 6 (+) Pos. Factor Pairs that multiply = 198 are:

(1 * 198) —- (2 * 99) — (3 * 66) —-(6 * 33) —-(9 * 22) —-(11 * 18)

Given that P >48 and Q >3, none of this Factor Pairs can be made to Satisfy both constraints at the same time and also multiply to 198

Furthermore, the sqrt(198) is a little bit greater than 14. As we keep spreading the 2 factors apart, logically there is no way we can find 2 (+)positive factors for P and Q that would satisfy both conditions AND multiply to 198.

This leaves us with D and E. At this point, we could make a guess and move on if we are short on time.

However, analyzing Answer D - 576, you can quickly spot that 6 is a factor of 576 —— (6 * 96 = 576)

Let the X- Intercept be at the Coordinates (6 , 0).

Given that the Line passes through Point (3 , 48), will the Line have a Y Intercept = Q = 96 when the X-Intercept = 6——- leading to the fact that (OP) * (OQ) = 576?


1st) Find the Equation of this Line with X Intercept (6 , 0):

We have 2 points to quickly find the slope: (6 , 0) and (3 , 48)

m = (rise) / (run) = (48 - 0) / (3 - 6) = -16

Slope Intercept Equation: y = - 16x + b

***where b = Y-Intercept at Point Q

2nd) Plug Point (3 , 48) into the slope intercept equation above in order to find b:

48 = -16*(3) + b

b = 96 ——- works! The Line with Slope -16 that passes through (3 , 48) and (6 ,0) will have a Y-Intercept = b = 96

3rd) In conclusion: Given that the Line must pass through (3 , 48) and cross both the (+)Pos. Y-Axis and (+) Pos. X-Axis ——

The X Intercept at Point P would have the coordinates (6 , 0). Line OP would = 6 units

The Y Intercept at Point Q would have the coordinates (0 , 96). Line OQ would = 96 units


OP * OQ = 6 * 96 = 576

Thus, given the Answer Choices, Choice D = 576 is the MIN Value that actually works given the constraints.

Answer -D-


EDIT: the post above mine is most likely the preferred way to do this problem. However, the knowledge required is high level and this is an alternate way to get there by Testing the Answer Choices.

Posted from my mobile device



Thankyou so much for the solution! I understood it in no time :)

However, I was wondering if we have to test the (6,96) with the line equation, since we are short in time on the paper.
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Apr 2025
Posts: 1,353
Own Kudos:
705
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,658
Posts: 1,353
Kudos: 705
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow, this was one of my first posts a loooong time ago. I believe I was doing my best to try to absorb a million different concepts.

Looking at the problem now, I believe it is solved much more easily using a concept that can be applied to certain optimization- type problems.

Concept:
Given 2 positive values, it will always be true that —

(arithmetic mean) >/= (geometric mean)

Here is a link to read up on the concept:

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2015/0 ... at-part-v/

Offhand, I can think of one or two official problems with which you could make use of this concept.

The other concept that is applicable in this problem is the use of the Intercept Form for the Graph of a Straight Line in the coordinate plane.

The graph of the straight line can be expressed in the form:

X / (X - intercept) + Y / (Y-intercept) = 1


1st) we can call the X- intercept point (p , 0) and the Y-Intercept (0 , q)

The equation for the graph of this line in Intercept Form would be:

(X / p) + (Y / q) = 1

Furthermore, since the line passes through the point (3 , 48), that coordinate point will satisfy the equation

Substituting (3 , 48) we get —

(3 / p) + (48 / q) = 1 ——(equation 1)

(2nd). Since p and q are positive values, we can apply the (A.M.) >/= (G.M.) concept

[(3/p) + (48/q)] / 2 >/= sqrt( (3/p) (48/q) )

Substitute the value 1 from equation 1 above in the numerator of the arithmetic mean (A.M.) on the left side of the inequality we get:

1 / 2 >/= sqrt( 144 / PQ )

Then square both sides

1 / 4 >/= 144 / PQ

PQ >/= (4) (144)

PQ >/= 576

So the product of the X intercept and the Y intercept must be greater than or equal to 576

Minimum value = 576

I wish I could help you with what I wrote almost 2 years ago. However, I sometimes forget what I had for breakfast 😂

Thank you for the kind words!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,375
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,375
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
102634 posts
PS Forum Moderator
688 posts