EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi Consultantwannabee,
While you could certainly attempt to study a little-bit-at-a-time for a few years, you'll likely find that approach won't be something that you can maintain. The GMAT is a consistent, predictable Exam, so you CAN train to score at a high level AND you can do so in a reasonable amount of time. Many Test Takers spend 3 (or more) months of consistent study time before they hit their 'peak' scores, so you should probably plan for that type of approach (but that won't be for several years).
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This is a little long, sorry:
I have a small update. I took Babson's Mini-GMAT test and scored an estimate of 560-590. The exam was 50 minutes per section, so 100 minutes total. I left about 23 minutes on the Quant and 25 minutes on the Verbal.
Obviously, I wasn't taking the exam all that seriously because I did not feel like sitting down for a full 100 minutes. I just wanted to see the structure of the test, how the time pressure felt, etc. I scored a 79% on the Quant and ~24% on Verbal. It said my weakest section on the verbal was reading comprehension, which is understandable, because I didn't read any of the passages and just filled in random choices.
I'm feeling a little better about the exam now. My main areas to improve on will be those problems where it goes like: abc =/= 0, what is a > 0? I, II, neither, together, etc. Data sufficiency it's called I believe. I have to admit I'm a little clueless when approaching those problems. Are there quick tricks for those? Everything else was fine, though. I'm quick with mental math so I was able to brute force a lot of the problem solving problems in ~45 seconds. Another question that stumped me was # of combinations (1 mother, 1 father, 2 children, 1 dog taking a family picture, mother and father want to stay beside each other, # of possible combinations?). Had no idea how to approach that.