Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
To me all the answer choices are wrong, because you need London after the comma (not a blitz or a refusal as a subject), since "having been bombed" refers specifically to London.
To me all the answer choices are wrong, because you need London after the comma (not a blitz or a refusal as a subject), since "having been bombed" refers specifically to London.
Show more
I totally agree with you. Having been bombed should refer to the subject London not to London's refusal. Bad question.
I totally agree with you buddies. The only problem is that this test question is from free https://gmatclub.com/tests/. May be one of GURUs will help to see pitfall in this question?
The posters are all correct: London (not London's something) must follow the modifier "having been bombed..."
It seems to me that this question intends to test two concepts: (1) the idiom "took on" and (2) the choice of a subject noun (or nouns) that could logically take on "... mythic significance." The existing explanation for (A) alludes to the misplaced modifier, the same explanation we should find for all the other choices! Also, I think the real GMAT might take issue with "it" in the original sentence. I think the antecedent of "it" is reasonably clearly "the Blitz," but I find "after it" to refer to an event a bit unidiomatic. You could leave "it" in, as it provides yet another reason the original is not best, but here's what I'd propose to fix this question:
Though the city had been bombed for fifty-seven nights in a row, the Blitz and the refusal to surrender London afterward took on almost mythic significance as evidence of British citizens’ ability to resist the will of Hitler and Nazi Germany.
(A) the Blitz and the refusal to surrender London afterward took on
(B) London’s Blitz and the refusal to surrender took after
(C) the Blitz and the refusal of the city of London took over
(D) London’s refusal to surrender after the Blitz took on
(E) London’s refusal to surrender after the Blitz took up
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.