Last visit was: 12 May 2026, 13:46 It is currently 12 May 2026, 13:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Skag55
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 121
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
farhanchaudhary
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Last visit: 24 Mar 2026
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Products:
Posts: 272
Kudos: 433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Skag55
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 121
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
farhanchaudhary
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Last visit: 24 Mar 2026
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Products:
Posts: 272
Kudos: 433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Definitely i agree with bb's post. But then there comes a time in gmat where you feel more than understanding what the problem involves you start focussing on the How approach??? The difficult 700 plus question need more time to understand. But at the same time when you feel you know the concept try solving the problem within two minutes. I usually leave the problem at 2 mins if i am not able to solve it and then go back to the explanation. After a day i revisit it and see if now i can solve it within two minutes. I completely understand the point of going over 2 mins for tough problems but we need to also gauge our understanding of the correct path if we are going overboard. The worst is you feel you can answer the question with extra time, spend 4 mins on it and get it wrong. To avoid this situation best to practice with timed sets. This should be done only after you know your base and concept understanding is good. Hence, all the problems in gmatclub now come with a timer ;). Do let me know if you are trying any other approach and see a significant improvement in your scores.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
User avatar
Skag55
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 121
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
farhanc85
I usually leave the problem at 2 mins if i am not able to solve it and then go back to the explanation. After a day i revisit it and see if now i can solve it within two minutes.

Is it worth trying for 2 mins and then going straight to the explanation? To put it differently, does it work? I feel that if I go straight to the explanation, like going back to 0 point. However I do see a point into revisiting. So how many hours can you squeeze out from a day doing that until your brain refuses to process any more information? :lol:
User avatar
farhanchaudhary
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Last visit: 24 Mar 2026
Posts: 272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Products:
Posts: 272
Kudos: 433
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skag55
farhanc85
I usually leave the problem at 2 mins if i am not able to solve it and then go back to the explanation. After a day i revisit it and see if now i can solve it within two minutes.

Is it worth trying for 2 mins and then going straight to the explanation? To put it differently, does it work? I feel that if I go straight to the explanation, like going back to 0 point. However I do see a point into revisiting. So how many hours can you squeeze out from a day doing that until your brain refuses to process any more information? :lol:


Usually 4 hours in the night. 9 to 1 :oops: going back to the explanations helps me keep tab if i was on a right track.
More oftern i find out that in difficult problem the start itself was wrong and i was going nowhere :shock:

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
User avatar
Skag55
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 121
Kudos: 191
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
farhanc85
Skag55
farhanc85
I usually leave the problem at 2 mins if i am not able to solve it and then go back to the explanation. After a day i revisit it and see if now i can solve it within two minutes.

Is it worth trying for 2 mins and then going straight to the explanation? To put it differently, does it work? I feel that if I go straight to the explanation, like going back to 0 point. However I do see a point into revisiting. So how many hours can you squeeze out from a day doing that until your brain refuses to process any more information? :lol:


Usually 4 hours in the night. 9 to 1 :oops: going back to the explanations helps me keep tab if i was on a right track.
More oftern i find out that in difficult problem the start itself was wrong and i was going nowhere :shock:

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Yeah, true. I think 80% is to understand the problem. Then, chances are that you have sold something similar in the past. Sometimes the problem can boil down so such a simple solution that it makes me laugh! (usually that's Bunuel's solutions :lol: )

I do believe that revision is good, however I find myself sometimes remembering the problem and hence the solution rather than checking if I understand the methodology.
User avatar
gowrinkishore
Joined: 20 May 2013
Last visit: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 13
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Yeah, true. I think 80% is to understand the problem. Then, chances are that you have sold something similar in the past. Sometimes the problem can boil down so such a simple solution that it makes me laugh! (usually that's Bunuel's solutions :lol: )

I do believe that revision is good, however I find myself sometimes remembering the problem and hence the solution rather than checking if I understand the methodology.

Yes, remembering problems you have solved before can happen if you have solved a lot of GMAT questions. This is especially true for Verbal. However, there is a big advantage to be gained from reviewing questions you have solved in the past:
1. Even if you got the question right the first time, make sure you got it right for the right reasons, and that it was not just a lucky guess. :)
2. This point applies especially for SC - you may have eliminated an answer option because of a very obvious SVA error. But there maybe other more subtle issues with the same choice. When you review this question, make sure you know everything that is wrong with each answer choice. This learning will come in handy in future questions.
3. If you got it wrong, then make sure you understand the delta between the answer choice you picked and the official answer - this delta is what you need to remember the next time you see a similar question. And you will certainly see a similar question - the GMAT is a very pattern-based test.

So if you are looking at questions you've previously solved and you remember the answer, go through the motions anyway. The idea is to get the maximum value out of every single official question that is available. :)

Gowri N Kishore
Verbal Specialist
CrackVerbal
Moderators:
200 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts