Official Explanation:Reporter: Country A and Country B both grow and export bananas. Last year, Country A lowered the cost of their bananas to a rate substantially less than that charged by Country B, and this led to Country A outselling Country B for the first time. Some observers were surprised by this, since Country B grew more bananas than Country A last year and there was no change made to the trade policies of either country.
Which of the following, if true, most helps explain the discrepancy in the relationships described by the reporter? A. Country A exports about 40% more goods to Country B than the other way around.B. Last year, both countries exported more bananas than at any time in the past.C. Country B lowered the cost of many of their exports last year in response to a nationwide recession.D. The government of Country A provided subsidies to banana growers last year as a way to promote exports of all produce grown there.E. The biggest importer of bananas from Country A bought about 20% more bananas last year than the year before.Question Type: Resolve Paradox
Boil It Down: After Country A dropped the price of their bananas last year, they outsold Country B for the first time ever. This was surprising, given that Country B grew more bananas than Country A last year.
Goal: Find the option that best explains how/why Country A was able to outsell Country B, even if they had fewer bananas to sell. Analysis:General comments about discrepancy/puzzling fact questions: Resolving a discrepancy/puzzle/paradox type questions involve trying to resolve a surprising fact or to reconcile two statements that seem to be incompatible. Your first task in answering these question types is to identify the puzzling fact or paradox. The correct answer choice will show the surprising fact is not so surprising after all or will show how it is possible that both statements that are seemingly at odds can be simultaneously true. In order to explain a puzzling fact or paradox, the correct answer choice must work on the first statement and show that it is compatible with the second, work on the second statement and show that it is compatible with the first, or introduce a piece of information that shows how the two statements are compatible. Answer choices that deal with neither of the two statements will be irrelevant.
Identify the Discrepancy/Puzzling Fact: Statement 1: Country A lowered their prices of bananas and outsold Country B
Statement 2: Country B grew more bananas that Country A, despite unchanging trade policies
The discrepancy/puzzling fact:
We are left to wonder, why or how did Country A outsell Country B, despite Country B growing more bananas? One would think that the more bananas a country grows, the lower they can sell the bananas. However, in this case, Country A, who grew fewer bananas, sold their bananas at a lower price.
An answer choice that explains this discrepancy/puzzling fact will answer that question. The correct answer choice will have to explain why A sold more than B or why B sold less than A.
A. Country A exports about 40% more goods to Country B than the other way around.
Incorrect. The discrepancy/puzzling fact deals with bananas, not exports in general. Therefore, answer choice A is irrelevant. B. Last year, both countries exported more bananas than at any time in the past.
Incorrect. This answer choice fails to explain why A sold more bananas than B. Therefore, answer choice B is irrelevant. C. Country B lowered the cost of many of their exports last year in response to a nationwide recession.
Incorrect. This answer choice fails to explain why A sold more bananas than B. Therefore, answer choice C is irrelevant. D. The government of Country A provided subsidies to banana growers last year as a way to promote exports of all produce grown there.
Correct. This answer choice helps explain how A could sell more bananas at a lower price, despite B growing more bananas. The government of Country A was subsidizing the crop so that the growers could sell them at lower prices despite growing fewer bananas than B. E. The biggest importer of bananas from Country A bought about 20% more bananas last year than the year before.
Incorrect. Even if this country helped increase Country A’s exports, it fails to explain how A was able to sell more bananas at a lower price compared to B, given that B grew more bananas. Therefore, answer choice E is irrelevant. Key Takeaway:Distilling the discrepancy to a succinct question can help evaluate the answer choices. For this scenario, the key question was why did Country A sell more bananas at a lower price than B, despite B growing more bananas. By identifying the key question, evaluating the answer choices becomes much easier and quicker.
Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.