Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:40 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Darth_McDaddy
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Last visit: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: USA
Posts: 181
Kudos: 893
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Darth_McDaddy
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Last visit: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: USA
Posts: 181
Kudos: 893
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Darth, I have come across numerous typos everywhere, but an S-V error of this nature is just plain sloppy. Just out of curiosity, was it from one of the big three prep companies (K-PR-MGMAT)? More importantly, was it stated like that as part of a question (SC) being tested, or just poorly written in the explanation notes?
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT73, I see your rule about "majority" but it did not address the difference between conjugating the verb following "majority + prepositional phrase + verb(plural or singular?)"

This is one of the rules which I talked about at length in this post:
https://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 2&start=20
Although the post starts with the general "X of Y" rule, I then talked about existing exceptions such as "some of X", "all of X", "a percentage of X" or "the majority of X". In those cases, you would conjugate the following verb with the prepositional phrase immediately preceding the verb.

Let me give you an example:
The majority of people are gone
The vast majority of the pizza is eaten

As you can see, depending on whether the preceding prepositional phrase in green is plural or singular, the verb following will be conjugated accordingly. The same applies for the exceptions which I mentioned to you above. However, when you say "the majority agrees", it only makes sense that the verb is singular because the subject is now a clear singular noun. Go through my detailed explanation for gmataquaguy and you will see what I meant.
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: the economist article is grammatically wrong
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paul, does it matter if we use the definate article the instead of the indefinate article a?

From your previous post you stated that certain plural nouns have multiple meanings depending on the article preceding them.

The number of calls is overwhelming --> definite article so verb is singular
A number of people are responding --> indefinite article so verb is plural

Comparing your second example to Darth`s example, we get:
A number of people are responding.
A majority of voters are opposed to the current policy.


Both sentences use the the article A and both are completed with the plural conjugation of "be".
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73, you are right when those articles are applied to "a/the number". This would not affect "majority of X" however. The fact is that when speaking of about "a number of X", we really mean more than 1 whereas "the number of X", we are specifically referring to a statistical number, the number being 100, 1000 or whatever. In other words, "number" has a different rule in that the article will define whether it should be viewed as a whole or as a singular subject.

Now apply that article concept to "majority"
Ex: The vast majority of the land is destroyed
EX: A vast majority of the land is destroyed

The example above shows that the article will not change the verb and that the latter is really conjugated with the number of the prepositional phrase, "land".
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In your given example, given that "voters" and "people" are plural and preceding the verb in "majority of X", the verb has to be plural.
User avatar
Darth_McDaddy
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Last visit: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: USA
Posts: 181
Kudos: 893
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
Darth, I have come across numerous typos everywhere, but an S-V error of this nature is just plain sloppy. Just out of curiosity, was it from one of the big three prep companies (K-PR-MGMAT)? More importantly, was it stated like that as part of a question (SC) being tested, or just poorly written in the explanation notes?


I took this sentence from the Manhattan GMAT SC prep guide. This sentence appears as part of a problem set in the Subject-verb agreement chapter. Their material and methodology is better than Kaplan and Princeton, but this is a glaring mistake.

Thanks
User avatar
Darth_McDaddy
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Last visit: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 181
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: USA
Posts: 181
Kudos: 893
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paul
Conclusion: the economist article is grammatically wrong


Hi Paul,

Thanks once again for explaining the concept to me. But, I took the "voters" example from the MGMAT material. I thought the economist article was correct. Could you clarify.

Thanks
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paul
GMATT73, you are right when those articles are applied to "a/the number". This would not affect "majority of X" however. The fact is that when speaking of about "a number of X", we really mean more than 1 whereas "the number of X", we are specifically referring to a statistical number, the number being 100, 1000 or whatever. In other words, "number" has a different rule in that the article will define whether it should be viewed as a whole or as a singular subject.

Now apply that article concept to "majority"
Ex: The vast majority of the land is destroyed
EX: A vast majority of the land is destroyed

The example above shows that the article will not change the verb and that the latter is really conjugated with the number of the prepositional phrase, "land".


I see you point Paul, however IMHO the two examples you give are still fundamentally different from Darth`s original sentence in that you have interjected the definate article the between the plural counting classifier "majority of" and the singular prepositional phrase, "land."

Ex: The vast majority of the land is destroyed
EX: A vast majority of the land is destroyed

Darth`s example didn`t use the definate article in the same way.

"A majority of voters are opposed to the current policy"

From what I can gather, your above examples clearly demonstrate this grammatical concept:

The majority of people are gone
The vast majority of the pizza is eaten
User avatar
Paul
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Last visit: 10 Nov 2012
Posts: 2,708
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,708
Kudos: 1,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well, this is the case simply because you cannot have a singular noun without an article. For example, while you can say, "I would like to have trees in my garden", you cannot say "I would like to have tree in my garden". You do need an article in front of singular nouns. As for "the" determining the number of the verb, we sort of say so only because it is incidental to the use of a singular noun.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts