Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 7 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we are rounding up the oddballs, the misfits, and the format-benders: EXCEPT, Fill-In-The-Blanks, and other unusual Critical Reasoning question types. When you see a question that ends with a literal blank line
For most test takers, Data Insights is the most challenging section on the GMAT, with test takers scoring several points lower on average on DI than on Quant or Verbal and completing the section with less time to spare.
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Heres a problem,
Aribica coffee costs .4 per ounce, robusta .3 per ounce. if the blend of both aribica and robusta costs .33, what is the share of arabica in this blend.
The solution gives the equations,
let A= ounces Arib, R= ounces Robusta
then,
(A*.4+R*.3)/(A+R)= .33
my question is why do you set up this type of equation, whats the principle? I just figured out combinations that would work, which I'm sure is the long way. So, I'm sure this eqn is more efficient, but I'm not sure why its being set up.
TIA.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Heres a problem, Aribica coffee costs .4 per ounce, robusta .3 per ounce. if the blend of both aribica and robusta costs .33, what is the share of arabica in this blend.
The solution gives the equations, let A= ounces Arib, R= ounces Robusta then, (A*.4+R*.3)/(A+R)= .33
my question is why do you set up this type of equation, whats the principle? I just figured out combinations that would work, which I'm sure is the long way. So, I'm sure this eqn is more efficient, but I'm not sure why its being set up. TIA.
Show more
Let the amt of Arabica coffee in 1 ounce of Blend be x
Let the amt of Arabica coffee in 1 ounce of Blend be y
->x+y =1 .....(1)
Cost of 1 ounce of arabica coffee is .4
Therefore cost of x ounce of arabica cofee is .4x
Cost of 1 ounce of Robustica coffee is .3
Therefore cost of y ounce of arabica cofee is .4y
Given :cost of blend/ounce = .33
->.4x+.3y = .33 ....(2)
Now solve equstions 1 and 2 to get values of x and y
x = .3
y =.7
Heres a problem, Aribica coffee costs .4 per ounce, robusta .3 per ounce. if the blend of both aribica and robusta costs .33, what is the share of arabica in this blend.
The solution gives the equations, let A= ounces Arib, R= ounces Robusta then, (A*.4+R*.3)/(A+R)= .33
my question is why do you set up this type of equation, whats the principle? I just figured out combinations that would work, which I'm sure is the long way. So, I'm sure this eqn is more efficient, but I'm not sure why its being set up. TIA.
Let the amt of Arabica coffee in 1 ounce of Blend be x Let the amt of Arabica coffee in 1 ounce of Blend be y ->x+y =1 .....(1)
Cost of 1 ounce of arabica coffee is .4 Therefore cost of x ounce of arabica cofee is .4x
Cost of 1 ounce of Robustica coffee is .3 Therefore cost of y ounce of arabica cofee is .4y
Given :cost of blend/ounce = .33
->.4x+.3y = .33 ....(2)
Now solve equstions 1 and 2 to get values of x and y x = .3 y =.7
Show more
But it is not specified that cost of 1 ounce of blend is 0.33
Is it ok to assume that its per ounce price?
thanks for your explanation, seems like a straight forward method.
I'm still curious though, why does the original explanation
divide, .4A+.3R/(A+R) and make it equal to .33. I think this is a very simple principle, but I seem to be having a mental block on it.
thanks again.
Heres a problem, Aribica coffee costs .4 per ounce, robusta .3 per ounce. if the blend of both aribica and robusta costs .33, what is the share of arabica in this blend.
The solution gives the equations, let A= ounces Arib, R= ounces Robusta then, (A*.4+R*.3)/(A+R)= .33
my question is why do you set up this type of equation, whats the principle? I just figured out combinations that would work, which I'm sure is the long way. So, I'm sure this eqn is more efficient, but I'm not sure why its being set up. TIA.
Show more
This solution is saying: (total cost of the mix in Pounds/ total weight of the mix in Ounces) = cost/ounce , it gives you the cost per ounce of mix.
There is a direct method recommended by Kaplan to solve this type of questions:
A: amount of Aribica coffee; R: amount of Robusta coffee
(Cost A-Cost Mix) * A = (Cost Mix-Cost R) * R
(0.3-0.33) * A = (0.33-0.4) * R
A/R = 7/3
Once you know the ratio (in this case weight of A to the weight of R) you can calculate the share of A in the total mix.
A/(A+R) = 7/(7+3) = 0.7 --> 70%
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.