Blandman121 wrote:
Hi there,
Basically, I would like to get an idea of whether the top tier MBA programs (Stanford, HBS, Columbia) are realistic or if I would be wiser to ration out application fees among more moderate schools.
The stats:
-Graduated from undergrad in May '13. 3.75 GPA, honors psych, deans list, GPA top 10% graduating class. GRE: 164Q, 170V
-For the past 14 months working as the primary data analyst for a high volume emergency room. First author on a publication in a nursing journal.
Thanks!
Hi Blandman,
I completely agree with the points raised above by phlaym39.
Your score translates to a 750 on GMAT (used the ETS conversion tool). This score is quite fantastic.
But the story goes beyond the GMAT/ GRE. Every MBA out there evaluates you on a range of criteria- academic capability, career progression, impact on organization, leadership potential, overall personality development, sense of career direction- these are the key ones. You are on track for academic capability, but the other components need some more work. Delay your MBA plans by another 2-3 years, and develop those fronts.
Career direction involves not just knowing what you want from your career a few years from now, but also how the MBA will help you achieve that, and how an MBA from a particular school will help. I suggest that you read up more about individual b-schools and visit them when you can. This kind of research is required to know whether its a Stanford, HBS, CBS or another b-school.
Hope that helps,