Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:50 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Humanities|   Long Passage|            
User avatar
RaviChandra
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Last visit: 06 Feb 2023
Posts: 307
Own Kudos:
4,212
 [373]
Given Kudos: 412
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE:Business Development (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 307
Kudos: 4,212
 [373]
39
Kudos
Add Kudos
333
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [117]
84
Kudos
Add Kudos
33
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [67]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [67]
49
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [19]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [19]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Passage breakdown


In the first paragraph (P1), the author:

  • Argues that history is not fixed.
  • Explains that “new pasts” can change interpretations and influence future events.

In the second paragraph, the author:

  • Supports his/her argument in P1 by citing Woodward’s Jim Crow lectures.
  • Explains that these lectures challenged the “prevailing dogma” on segregation.

In the final paragraph, the author:

  • Provides support for his/her argument in P1 by showing Woodward’s book affected future events (i.e. civil rights movement).
  • Suggests that Woodward saw “handicaps” in his work -- inaccuracies caused by writing too close to the time he wrote about.


For more on the process of breaking down RC passages, check out this article and our live RC videos.


Explanations for individual questions


­
General Discussion
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,012
 [8]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,012
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Indeed tough even though I read something more worse than this.

Back to the 2 and 3 question

Actually , whenever you must infer something from a passage on the gmat you must keep in mind these two things:

1) the answer is always some line before or after the central point you were asked

2) the answer is always a restatement (i.e using other words to say the same thing) of the passage

2 question

He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s.

D is the answer

3 question

the solution to this is a bit far from line 27

Yet, like Paine, Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment, and of how historical evidence could undermine the mythological tradition that was crushing the dreams of new social possibilities.

Only C resembles the underlined part. I mean: you judge the operate of a new presidet that took office and as such a new way to reach results, a new deal if you called, and then an article critique soon after the same president's operate from an hystorical stand point.

Actually, the best strategy is to read the entire passage very carefully. Only through this way you can catch the sense as whole because often the answer is far away from the point you are focus on.

Hope this helps
User avatar
RahulSingh13
Joined: 05 Nov 2015
Last visit: 08 May 2017
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
48
 [5]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 31
Kudos: 48
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q2 asks what was the prevailing dogma or the prevalent opinion/belief considered to be absolutely true and irrefutable at the time about the history of racial segregation in the South. So what we need to establish here is that what was the general perception of the people before that perception was changed by the lectures of Woodward regarding the Jim Crow laws of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Since we can see from the passage that Woodward's view of these laws were revisionist and he states these laws actually furthered the segregation of the Black folks. We can infer that these laws were passed under the guise of promoting desegregation but it instead made the situation of the Black people worse. So the Prevailing Dogma of the people at the time these laws were in effect and until Woodward's offered his revisionist views was that these laws were helping the black people (the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws) but instead as Woodward's revised views suggest they were doing the opposite.

Q3 asks us to determine what would be the most appropriate analogy for 'Handicaps' as mentioned in the third paragraph. The handicaps here alludes to history of American Revolution published in 1776. Since the American revolution took place itself in that time period and perhaps was even ongoing in 1776, publishing a book about it already would be a little premature and hasty. Similarly, assessing the historical importance of a President who has just taken office is premature too. The President's term needs to come to an end for an effective assessment of his time in office.

Hope i made some sense. This was my thinking to get the answers.

Although, I have a doubt about Q5 and some help would be appreciated. How can we say that the attitude of the author is qualified approbation, as per my understanding approbation means a formal approval a sanction. What in the passage suggests that the author is qualified to give a formal approval to Woodwork's work or am i reading this wrong? I chose option A.
User avatar
ShashankDave
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Last visit: 26 Jan 2020
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 872
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
Posts: 218
Kudos: 288
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Somebody please help with Q3. I didn't understand the meaning of handicaps even when I read the passage. Please somebody explain the meaning in the passage. Also in the last question, please explain why A is wrong.
User avatar
gps5441
Joined: 04 May 2014
Last visit: 03 Feb 2018
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
81
 [4]
Given Kudos: 126
Location: India
WE:Sales (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Posts: 106
Kudos: 81
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q3 requires a basic understanding of when the American Revolution started and ended, non-Americans will not have this understanding. Surprised that this is an official guide question.
Rest of the questions can be answered by reading the passage.
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
1,095
 [11]
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 234
Kudos: 1,095
 [11]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gps5441
Q3 requires a basic understanding of when the American Revolution started and ended, non-Americans will not have this understanding. Surprised that this is an official guide question.
Rest of the questions can be answered by reading the passage.
True, this question would be easier with a knowledge of the American Revolution (this question is from an older edition of the OG and may have been retired for that very reason).

But we are given some clues. The very first sentence says that, "Historians sometimes forget that history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read." We can infer that since history is continually being made, attempting to write a history WHILE events are unfolding would be problematic.

A main theme throughout the passage is that it is difficult to write an objective history if you are someone who has lived or is living through the historical events themselves. For example, Thomas Paine wanted to reach and inspire. He was more concerned with ALTERING the course of history than with writing an objective account (which is why he would have apologized for the TIMING of his pamphlet). Similarly, C. Vann Woodward's lectures had a "profound effect" on the civil rights movement because he delivered them DURING a revolutionary time. Given the contextual clues, it seems likely that the American Revolution was either ongoing or had just finished in 1776. The author would likely agree that someone who is actively involved in the historical events would likely have a skewed point of view.

There is evidence pointing us towards choice (E), and, using process of elimination, this is a better choice than the other options.

But, yes, knowing that the American Revolution happened ~200-250 years ago is "common knowledge" that would help in answering this question.
User avatar
shubham2312
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Last visit: 20 Oct 2021
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,962
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.1
Products:
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
Posts: 84
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi
guys can someone explain why OA for question 4 is E not A,
in my understanding the reason is both the works were published during an important historical event.

kindly someone throw some light on it.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [14]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [14]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shubham2312
hi
guys can someone explain why OA for question 4 is E not A,
in my understanding the reason is both the works were published during an important historical event.

kindly someone throw some light on it.
Quote:
4. The passage suggests that C. Vann Woodward and Thomas Paine were similar in all of the following ways EXCEPT:

(A) Both had works published in the midst of important historical events.
(B) Both wrote works that enjoyed widespread popularity.
(C) Both exhibited an understanding of the relevance of historical evidence to contemporary issues.
(D) The works of both had a significant effect on events following their publication.
(E) Both were able to set aside worries about historical anachronism in order to reach and inspire.
Yes, (A) must be eliminated because both had works published in the midst of important historical events:

  • Woodward's work was published during the civil rights movement.
  • Paine's work was published during the American revolutionary movement.

As for (E), the passage does say that Paine was not concerned with the dangers of historical anachronism. However, we don't know that he was ever really worried about historical anachronism or that he had to set those worries aside. Similarly, we don't know whether Woodward worried about historical anachronism and set those worries aside.

(E) is the best answer.
avatar
papasmurf
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Last visit: 03 Oct 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
0
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't understand why the OA for question 4 isn't option D. That particular portion is even referenced in the passage!
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5. The attitude of the author of the passage toward the work of C. Vann Woodward is best described as one of

(A) respectful regard
(B) qualified approbation
(C) implied skepticism
(D) pointed criticism
(E) fervent advocacy

Hi GMATNinja,

I am confused between A and B in question 5.
I understood the reasoning behind eliminating C,D and E but not for eliminating B .

Can you please delineate these to options and how to eliminate B
avatar
raveesh1203
Joined: 26 May 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 10
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Need help with Q2 .
According to C. Vann ..Jim crow laws codified traditional practice + effort to erase progress made by black people..

He challenged prevailing dogma when he said this.

So should'nt the prevailing dogma be that jim crows law were passed for uniformity and maintain order ... i.e. option B

Thanks in advance

Sent from my Lenovo K33a42 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
PriyankaPalit7
Joined: 28 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 883
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V37
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 124
Kudos: 563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone please give an explanation for Question 1?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PriyankaPalit7
Can anyone please give an explanation for Question 1?

Q1, Explained



Here is the first paragraph of the passage:
Quote:
Historians sometimes forget that history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their own history, of course, which may impinge in unexpected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict when “new pasts” will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history.
 
Let's say that an event occurred in the 1800's -- it is "made and experienced" at that exact time.

Then, a historian comes along and studies, interprets, and reads about that event. His/her work creates an "established historical interpretation" of that event.

Later, another historian decides to study/interpret/read about the same event, and comes up with a different interpretation. This historian has created a new way of looking at the past, which overturns the established historical interpretation. In other words, the work of this latest historian creates a "new past" that differs from the way people previously understood the past event.

This definition of "new pasts" fits well with answer choice (C):
Quote:
(C) ["new pasts" can be described as the] change in people’s understanding of the past due to more recent historical writing
(C) is the correct answer to question #1.

I hope that helps!­
User avatar
shabuzen102
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Last visit: 24 Jul 2020
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 67
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
shubham2312
hi
guys can someone explain why OA for question 4 is E not A,
in my understanding the reason is both the works were published during an important historical event.

kindly someone throw some light on it.
Quote:
4. The passage suggests that C. Vann Woodward and Thomas Paine were similar in all of the following ways EXCEPT:

(A) Both had works published in the midst of important historical events.
(B) Both wrote works that enjoyed widespread popularity.
(C) Both exhibited an understanding of the relevance of historical evidence to contemporary issues.
(D) The works of both had a significant effect on events following their publication.
(E) Both were able to set aside worries about historical anachronism in order to reach and inspire.
Yes, (A) must be eliminated because both had works published in the midst of important historical events:

  • Woodward's work was published during the civil rights movement.
  • Paine's work was published during the American revolutionary movement.

As for (E), the passage does say that Paine was not concerned with the dangers of historical anachronism. However, we don't know that he was ever really worried about historical anachronism or that he had to set those worries aside. Similarly, we don't know whether Woodward worried about historical anachronism and set those worries aside.

(E) is the best answer.

Dear GMATNinja,

I think the reason why E is correct is not the difference between "not concerned" but "set aside worries", but because of the structural words: "Although....also,...." and then "Yet, like Paine, ...."
It goes something like this: "Although they have something in common (mass readership), Paine is still different from Woodward in that he is not concerned...bla bla. Yet, like Paine, they're still similar in another aspect bla bla...."

So Woodward and Paine share a lot of things, except for things in the second clause of that "Although" sentence: "Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism" -> Woodward DID NOT intend to reach and inspire: Woodward might have been a historian and might have been concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism.

Actually I just checked in real life, Woodward was actually a historian! :)

What do you think?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shabuzen102
GMATNinja
shubham2312
hi
guys can someone explain why OA for question 4 is E not A,
in my understanding the reason is both the works were published during an important historical event.

kindly someone throw some light on it.
Quote:
4. The passage suggests that C. Vann Woodward and Thomas Paine were similar in all of the following ways EXCEPT:

(A) Both had works published in the midst of important historical events.
(B) Both wrote works that enjoyed widespread popularity.
(C) Both exhibited an understanding of the relevance of historical evidence to contemporary issues.
(D) The works of both had a significant effect on events following their publication.
(E) Both were able to set aside worries about historical anachronism in order to reach and inspire.
Yes, (A) must be eliminated because both had works published in the midst of important historical events:

  • Woodward's work was published during the civil rights movement.
  • Paine's work was published during the American revolutionary movement.

As for (E), the passage does say that Paine was not concerned with the dangers of historical anachronism. However, we don't know that he was ever really worried about historical anachronism or that he had to set those worries aside. Similarly, we don't know whether Woodward worried about historical anachronism and set those worries aside.

(E) is the best answer.

Dear GMATNinja,

I think the reason why E is correct is not the difference between "not concerned" but "set aside worries", but because of the structural words: "Although....also,...." and then "Yet, like Paine, ...."
It goes something like this: "Although they have something in common (mass readership), Paine is still different from Woodward in that he is not concerned...bla bla. Yet, like Paine, they're still similar in another aspect bla bla...."

So Woodward and Paine share a lot of things, except for things in the second clause of that "Although" sentence: "Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism" -> Woodward DID NOT intend to reach and inspire: Woodward might have been a historian and might have been concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism.

Actually I just checked in real life, Woodward was actually a historian! :)

What do you think?
I think you're onto something! The structure of that sentence does imply that Paine differed from Woodward in that Paine was not a historian and thus was not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism. I might not go as far as to definitively conclude that Woodward was NOT intending to reach and inspire -- I think the key inference is that Woodward was concerned with accuracy/anachronism and Paine was not.

Regardless, we certainly cannot infer that Woodward set aside worries about historical anachronism, and that's enough to eliminate (E). We also can't really infer that Paine set aside worries about historical anachronism, because it doesn't seem like he ever HAD those worries in the first place (since historical anachronism did not concern him).

Thanks for pointing that out!
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 492
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 492
Kudos: 1,271
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Q2, Explained


raveesh1203
Need help with Q2 .
According to C. Vann ..Jim crow laws codified traditional practice + effort to erase progress made by black people..

He challenged prevailing dogma when he said this.

So should'nt the prevailing dogma be that jim crows law were passed for uniformity and maintain order ... i.e. option B
Quote:
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the “prevailing dogma” (line 10) held that
To answer this question, let’s take a closer look at the text:

    "In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South.”

"Concerning" means "about." If I mention that I have a belief concerning cat videos, I haven't told you what the content of my belief is. Maybe I love cat videos, or maybe I hate them. Perhaps I have an interesting theory about cat videos and why they’re so popular. Likewise, when the author mentions “the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South," we have learned nothing about what the prevailing dogma was. We only know that there was some dominant belief about the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. Let's keep reading.

    "He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s.

Aha! Vann Woodward argued that Jim Crow not only codified traditional practice, but also meant to erase the progress that black people had made. His argument says that Jim Crow wasn't just turning traditions into law (this was the existing belief about the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation). According to Van Woodward, Jim Crow was also undoing progress that black people had had made during Reconstruction (this was the revisionist view that made a big impact on how people interpreted the continuity of Jim Crow as a traditional practice).

To help understand the logical structure here, consider the following example:
  • Say that the prevailing dogma about butter is that it is bad for your heart. To keep things simple, let's say that this is the only bad thing about butter according to the prevailing view.
  • You then conduct a bunch of research related to butter and conclude that butter also kills brain cells (let's hope not!).
  • You then might say, "Butter is NOT ONLY bad for your heart BUT ALSO bad for your brain!"
  • The "not only" part was the accepted dogma, while the "but also" was something new. This new discovery challenges the existing view, which is that butter is only bad for your heart.
  • Note that you are NOT saying that butter is good for your heart, but you are still challenging the prevailing dogma.

Similarly:
  • The prevailing dogma saw Jim Crow as a continuation of traditional, discriminatory practices.
  • Vann Woodward argued that Jim Crow was also a reversal of Reconstruction.

Let's make sure we review every answer choice and confirm whether it matches this understanding.

Quote:
(A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South
This matches what we’ve read. At the time, people believed that Jim Crow laws had codified (i.e. made into law) traditional practices of discrimination against black people. Vann Woodward challenged this belief in the historical continuity of racial segregation by arguing that Jim Crow laws also erased the prior progress black people had made during Reconstruction.

Quote:
(B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory practices of different southern states
Was the point of Jim Crow to reduce differences between individual states? No. Vann Woodward challenged a widely held belief in the historical continuity of Jim Crow, not the geographic continuity of Jim Crow. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction
This is what Vann Woodward argued, not the dogma he argued against. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws
Both Vann Woodward and people of his time believed that Jim Crow had codified, not disrupted, traditional practices of racial segregation. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect of earlier Jim Crow laws
There is no mention of "earlier" Jim Crow Laws anywhere in the passage. Eliminate (E).

(A) is the best choice available.


GMATNinja
i thought that not only x but also y here would mean that the prevailing dogma was wrong about two things:
1) People thought that he's doing the OPPOSITE of turning traditions into law. Basically the laws were being eradicated. And,
2) people thought that the laws had a considerable effort to improve the conditions of black people

how would we differentiate this understanding from the one mentioned by you?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kritisood
GMATNinja

Q2, Explained


raveesh1203
Need help with Q2 .
According to C. Vann ..Jim crow laws codified traditional practice + effort to erase progress made by black people..

He challenged prevailing dogma when he said this.

So should'nt the prevailing dogma be that jim crows law were passed for uniformity and maintain order ... i.e. option B
Quote:
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the “prevailing dogma” (line 10) held that
To answer this question, let’s take a closer look at the text:

    "In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South.”

"Concerning" means "about." If I mention that I have a belief concerning cat videos, I haven't told you what the content of my belief is. Maybe I love cat videos, or maybe I hate them. Perhaps I have an interesting theory about cat videos and why they’re so popular. Likewise, when the author mentions “the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South," we have learned nothing about what the prevailing dogma was. We only know that there was some dominant belief about the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. Let's keep reading.

    "He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s.

Aha! Vann Woodward argued that Jim Crow not only codified traditional practice, but also meant to erase the progress that black people had made. His argument says that Jim Crow wasn't just turning traditions into law (this was the existing belief about the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation). According to Van Woodward, Jim Crow was also undoing progress that black people had had made during Reconstruction (this was the revisionist view that made a big impact on how people interpreted the continuity of Jim Crow as a traditional practice).

To help understand the logical structure here, consider the following example:
  • Say that the prevailing dogma about butter is that it is bad for your heart. To keep things simple, let's say that this is the only bad thing about butter according to the prevailing view.
  • You then conduct a bunch of research related to butter and conclude that butter also kills brain cells (let's hope not!).
  • You then might say, "Butter is NOT ONLY bad for your heart BUT ALSO bad for your brain!"
  • The "not only" part was the accepted dogma, while the "but also" was something new. This new discovery challenges the existing view, which is that butter is only bad for your heart.
  • Note that you are NOT saying that butter is good for your heart, but you are still challenging the prevailing dogma.

Similarly:
  • The prevailing dogma saw Jim Crow as a continuation of traditional, discriminatory practices.
  • Vann Woodward argued that Jim Crow was also a reversal of Reconstruction.

Let's make sure we review every answer choice and confirm whether it matches this understanding.

Quote:
(A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South
This matches what we’ve read. At the time, people believed that Jim Crow laws had codified (i.e. made into law) traditional practices of discrimination against black people. Vann Woodward challenged this belief in the historical continuity of racial segregation by arguing that Jim Crow laws also erased the prior progress black people had made during Reconstruction.

Quote:
(B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory practices of different southern states
Was the point of Jim Crow to reduce differences between individual states? No. Vann Woodward challenged a widely held belief in the historical continuity of Jim Crow, not the geographic continuity of Jim Crow. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction
This is what Vann Woodward argued, not the dogma he argued against. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws
Both Vann Woodward and people of his time believed that Jim Crow had codified, not disrupted, traditional practices of racial segregation. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect of earlier Jim Crow laws
There is no mention of "earlier" Jim Crow Laws anywhere in the passage. Eliminate (E).

(A) is the best choice available.


GMATNinja
i thought that not only x but also y here would mean that the prevailing dogma was wrong about two things:
1) People thought that he's doing the OPPOSITE of turning traditions into law. Basically the laws were being eradicated. And,
2) people thought that the laws had a considerable effort to improve the conditions of black people

how would we differentiate this understanding from the one mentioned by you?
Question #2 asks us to make an inference about the prevailing dogma, which means that the information won't be explicitly stated in the passage. Instead, we have to piece together clues from the passage to decide what we can and cannot infer.

The biggest hint is that Woodward challenged the prevailing dogma by arguing that Jim Crow laws:
  • NOT ONLY "codified traditional practice"
  • BUT ALSO "were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s."

Here, the author's intent is to provide a contrast between the prevailing dogma and Woodward's argument. So, which interpretation of "not only/but also" fits best with this intention?

The first option is that BOTH the prevailing dogma and Woodward's challenge argue that Jim Crow laws "codified traditional practice," but that Woodward thinks these laws also erased the progress made by Black people. This provides a clear contrast between the two arguments.

The second option is that we have absolutely no idea what the prevailing dogma argued, just that Woodward challenged the argument in two ways. This doesn't provide a great contrast, because we can't cleanly compare Woodward's beliefs to the prevailing dogma. In addition, none of the answer choices can be inferred if you look at it this way -- which is a good clue that you've misinterpreted something in the passage.

By looking at the author's intent, we can surmise that the first option is the correct interpretation of the "not only/but also" construction.

I hope that helps!
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts