Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
[quote="Himalayan"]x + 1.1 x(10) = 132000
x = 11,000[/quote]
Hi Himalayan,
Can you please explain your reasoning to get to the value of 11,000? Your numbers seem to be much nicer than mines :) so I wonder why my reasoning is incorrect?
Thanks!
Can you please explain your reasoning to get to the value of 11,000? Your numbers seem to be much nicer than mines so I wonder why my reasoning is incorrect? Thanks!
Show more
if you tale x as the larger/largest and 0.9 as the smaler/smallest, the the difference could be grater than 10%. in your case, 10% of 1211 is correct. (calculate difference as % of both 10900 and 1211).
But if you take the difference as the % of 10900, then it is greater than 10%, which is not correct.
In my case, the difference is 10% or less than x (11000).
Its always good to see how these types of problems can be simplified. I made this much more complicated on myself as I was plugging in each solution and narrowing down that way.
I think the formula is really:
x + (10) (1.1x) >= 132000
Really you just want to make sure that the 10 districts which have a population above the min population district can absorb the remaining population.
So if the min population is 11000, can the remaining districts absorb the remaining 121000 population without any one district going over 12100 (11000(1.1)).
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.