Last visit was: 08 Jun 2026, 12:49 It is currently 08 Jun 2026, 12:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Foreheadson
Joined: 22 Jun 2020
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: Georgia
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.71
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V38
Posts: 150
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
einstein801
Joined: 23 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Feb 2025
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 147
Kudos: 246
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,140
Own Kudos:
819,605
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106,721
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,140
Kudos: 819,605
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MuditKapoor
Joined: 19 Dec 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 24
Given Kudos: 757
Location: India
Posts: 24
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I didn't get the idea of splitting the numbers in 2 subsets:

Though my answer is incorrect but i would like to understand the flaw in my understanding :

Hundreds place could be written in 2c1 ways tens in 9C1 and unit place be filled in 5C1 ways

Is there any way of reaching the answer without splitting the entire numbers ?

walker
Let's xyz is our integer.

x e {8,9}
y e {0...9}
z e {1,3,5,7,9}

So, we have 1[x]*5[z]*(10-2)[y] = 40 integers that begin with 8 and 1[x]*4[z]*(10-2)[y] = 32 integers that begin with 9.
N = 40 + 32 = 72
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 30 May 2026
Posts: 852
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
Posts: 852
Kudos: 934
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MuditKapoor
Hi,

I didn't get the idea of splitting the numbers in 2 subsets:

Though my answer is incorrect but i would like to understand the flaw in my understanding :

Hundreds place could be written in 2c1 ways tens in 9C1 and unit place be filled in 5C1 ways

Is there any way of reaching the answer without splitting the entire numbers ?
All the digits, in the three digit no. should be distinct

When you take 2C1, 9C1, and 5C1 for hundreds, tens, and units digits respectively, it includes cases such as 919, 877, 955, etc. where 2 digits are similar => hence this approach is incorrect.

Since you know that hundreds digit can either be 8, or 9, we can take each case separately.

8 _ 1 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
8 _ 3 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
8 _ 5 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
8 _ 7 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
8 _ 9 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit

9 _ 1 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
9 _ 3 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
9 _ 5 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
9 _ 7 => 8 possible ways to fill tens digit
You cannot take 9 _ 9, since the digits have to be distinct

Thus, from above 8*9 = 72 possible odd integers between 800 and 1000, having each digit distinct.
User avatar
sindhukavi2657
Joined: 26 May 2025
Last visit: 02 Feb 2026
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think we can do it this way;

2*9*4=72, hence C
User avatar
bishal128
Joined: 30 May 2025
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 24
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Using the same technique as learned in previous concept by @Bunuel;
Three digits odd integer with non repeating digits above 800
THus, possible range
800-899
900-999
For first range, first digit is 8, thus leaving two digits permutation from the possible range of single digit except 8 (i:e 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9), order is important thus, possible ways of unique arrangements 9P2.
With same logic, for 900 range possible uniqe arrangements 9P2 (except digit "9", ordered combination of two digits from list of other 9 number)

Total possible number combination of unique digits both odd and even (2* 9P2), and we need only odds there is exactly half of it as odd thus,
total number of odds three digits number above 800 is given by (2*9P2)/2=72

Bunuel, is this approach right? Can it be used in all such cases?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,140
Own Kudos:
819,605
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106,721
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,140
Kudos: 819,605
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bishal128
Using the same technique as learned in previous concept by @Bunuel;
Three digits odd integer with non repeating digits above 800
THus, possible range
800-899
900-999
For first range, first digit is 8, thus leaving two digits permutation from the possible range of single digit except 8 (i:e 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9), order is important thus, possible ways of unique arrangements 9P2.
With same logic, for 900 range possible uniqe arrangements 9P2 (except digit "9", ordered combination of two digits from list of other 9 number)

Total possible number combination of unique digits both odd and even (2* 9P2), and we need only odds there is exactly half of it as odd thus,
total number of odds three digits number above 800 is given by (2*9P2)/2=72

Bunuel, is this approach right? Can it be used in all such cases?

The final numerical answer happens to be correct, but the approach is not correct. You cannot simply count all three-digit numbers with different digits and divide by 2, because odd and even cases are not necessarily split equally. In fact, there are 40 odd numbers from 800 to 899 but only 32 odd numbers from 900 to 999, so if either range were considered alone, this method would give the wrong result. The safe method is to count the units digit directly: 5 * 8 + 4 * 8 = 40 + 32 = 72.
   1   2 
Moderator:
Math Expert
111140 posts