GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Oct 2018, 14:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 630 Q46 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2012, 07:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived. (Page 108)

Is use of 'whom' correct?

Shoudn't it be 'who'?

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: GMATCLUB grammar: Restrictive and non-restrictive clauses  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2012, 16:06
2
bonjoindia wrote:
I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived. (Page 108)

Is use of 'whom' correct? Shouldn't it be 'who'?

Absolutely correct. It should be "who" --- the "case" of the relative pronoun depends entirely on its grammatical role within the relative clause. Here the relative clause is .....

who was shivering and cold

... and "who" is the subject of that clause. Pretend we removed that clause, and substituted for who/whom the personal pronoun I/me, to make it an independent clause

I was shivering and cold = correct
me was shivering and cold = incorrect

If "I' is correct, then "who" is correct. If "me" is correct, then "whom" is correct. Those are pairs of pronouns of the same "case."

Here's a sentence that requires "whom"

The boy whom the older woman comforted was shivering and cold.

Now, within the relative clause ......

whom the older woman comforted

.... the "whom" is the direct object, the object of the comforting, so it has to be in the objective case. Again, substitute the pronoun I/me ----

me the older woman comforted

--- the word order is Yoda-like there, but the basic grammar is correct --- it's very clear who gives and who receives.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 630 Q46 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: GMATCLUB grammar: Restrictive and non-restrictive clauses  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2012, 00:14
mikemcgarry wrote:
bonjoindia wrote:
I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived. (Page 108)

Is use of 'whom' correct? Shouldn't it be 'who'?

Absolutely correct. It should be "who" --- the "case" of the relative pronoun depends entirely on its grammatical role within the relative clause. Here the relative clause is .....

who was shivering and cold

... and "who" is the subject of that clause. Pretend we removed that clause, and substituted for who/whom the personal pronoun I/me, to make it an independent clause

I was shivering and cold = correct
me was shivering and cold = incorrect

If "I' is correct, then "who" is correct. If "me" is correct, then "whom" is correct. Those are pairs of pronouns of the same "case."

Here's a sentence that requires "whom"

The boy whom the older woman comforted was shivering and cold.

Now, within the relative clause ......

whom the older woman comforted

.... the "whom" is the direct object, the object of the comforting, so it has to be in the objective case. Again, substitute the pronoun I/me ----

me the older woman comforted

--- the word order is Yoda-like there, but the basic grammar is correct --- it's very clear who gives and who receives.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)


Makes perfect sense. Crystal clear concepts.

Actually, I was using a different approach:

I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived.
I comforted the lost boy before the authorities arrived. The lost boy was shivering with cold. (the 'lost boy' is clearly the subject of the relative clause; hence 'who' should be used)

The boy whom the older woman comforted was shivering and cold.
The boy was shivering and cold. The older woman comforted the boy. (the 'boy' is clearly the object of the relative clause; hence 'whom' should be used)

Also, let's see the following example:
The boy was shivering and cold. The boy was comforted by the older woman.
In this case, the output would be: The boy who was comforted by the older woman was shivering and cold
Is my approach is correct.

Anyway, Kudos to you for your explanations!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: GMATCLUB grammar: Restrictive and non-restrictive clauses  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2012, 12:16
bonjoindia wrote:
Makes perfect sense. Crystal clear concepts.

Actually, I was using a different approach:

(1) I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived.
I comforted the lost boy before the authorities arrived. The lost boy was shivering with cold. (the 'lost boy' is clearly the subject of the relative clause; hence 'who' should be used)

(2) The boy whom the older woman comforted was shivering and cold.
The boy was shivering and cold. The older woman comforted the boy. (the 'boy' is clearly the object of the relative clause; hence 'whom' should be used)

Also, let's see the following example:
(3) The boy was shivering and cold. The boy was comforted by the older woman.
In this case, the output would be: The boy who was comforted by the older woman was shivering and cold
Is my approach is correct.

The first sentence is incorrect.
(1) I comforted the lost boy, who was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived.
Within the subordinate clause "X was shivering and cold", X is the subject --- we would say
"he was shivering and cold"
and NOT
"him was shivering and cold"
This means "whom" is wrong and "who" is correct. You seemed to indicate this in your comment -- perhaps this was merely an oversight.

Sentence #2 is perfectly correct.

Sentence #3, while technically correct according to grammar rules, would never be acceptable on the GMAT, because it is wildly indirect and passive. That's an excellent example of a sentence that is 100% grammatically correct and yet would be an absolute abomination on the GMAT SC.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Founder
Founder
User avatar
V
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 16847
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: GMATCLUB grammar: Restrictive and non-restrictive clauses  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2012, 13:00
Moved to the proper (SC) forum.
Thanks.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
OG2019 Directory is here! - New!
Verbal OG2019 Directory is here! - New!
Quant OG2019 Directory is here! - New!

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 630 Q46 V31
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: GMATCLUB grammar: Restrictive and non-restrictive clauses  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2012, 15:29
mikemcgarry wrote:
bonjoindia wrote:
Makes perfect sense. Crystal clear concepts.

Actually, I was using a different approach:

(1) I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived.
I comforted the lost boy before the authorities arrived. The lost boy was shivering with cold. (the 'lost boy' is clearly the subject of the relative clause; hence 'who' should be used)

(2) The boy whom the older woman comforted was shivering and cold.
The boy was shivering and cold. The older woman comforted the boy. (the 'boy' is clearly the object of the relative clause; hence 'whom' should be used)

Also, let's see the following example:
(3) The boy was shivering and cold. The boy was comforted by the older woman.
In this case, the output would be: The boy who was comforted by the older woman was shivering and cold
Is my approach is correct.

The first sentence is incorrect.
(1) I comforted the lost boy, who was shivering and cold, before the authorities arrived.
Within the subordinate clause "X was shivering and cold", X is the subject --- we would say
"he was shivering and cold"
and NOT
"him was shivering and cold"
This means "whom" is wrong and "who" is correct. You seemed to indicate this in your comment -- perhaps this was merely an oversight.

Sentence #2 is perfectly correct.

Sentence #3, while technically correct according to grammar rules, would never be acceptable on the GMAT, because it is wildly indirect and passive. That's an excellent example of a sentence that is 100% grammatically correct and yet would be an absolute abomination on the GMAT SC.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)


I hope that Sentence #3 doesn't come up as an option in GMAT SC. :)
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3230
Premium Member
Re: I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2018, 08:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold, &nbs [#permalink] 12 Mar 2018, 08:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

I comforted the lost boy, whom was shivering and cold,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.