Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 08:51 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 08:51

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 169
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
Allen,
Thanks for starting this thread. I also had the same problem. I can solve the set/venn diagram problems (2D or 3D) using the diagramming method, however, it takes a long time compared to this plug in formula method.

Also, one other area I want to improve on is the the "mixture" problems. DO we have a thread that talks about solving those types of problems? Does anybody have any links for practicing those type of problems?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 321 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
allen,
Have u heard this problem .? Let us try this one.
See if we can get it solved without any visual diagrams.

There is a shortage of tubelights, bulbs and fans in a village. It is found that
• All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan.
• exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of these.
• atleast 67% of houses do not have tubelights.
• atleast 83% of houses do not have bulbs.
• atleast 73% of houses do not have fans.
What percentage of houses have
(i) all three items tubelight, bulb and fan missing?
(ii)exactly 2 items missing?
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
chan4312 wrote:
allen,
Have u heard this problem .? Let us try this one.
See if we can get it solved without any visual diagrams.

There is a shortage of tubelights, bulbs and fans in a village. It is found that
• All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan.
• exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of these.
• atleast 67% of houses do not have tubelights.
• atleast 83% of houses do not have bulbs.
• atleast 73% of houses do not have fans.
What percentage of houses have
(i) all three items tubelight, bulb and fan missing?
(ii)exactly 2 items missing?


I think there is something wrong with the words used. If you use "at least 67%" that doesn't tell me anything. It could be 100% of houses do not have tubelights because 100% is at least 67%. I don't think it can be answered definitively as written.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 321 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
jallenmorris wrote:
chan4312 wrote:
allen,
Have u heard this problem .? Let us try this one.
See if we can get it solved without any visual diagrams.

There is a shortage of tubelights, bulbs and fans in a village. It is found that
• All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan.
• exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of these.
• atleast 67% of houses do not have tubelights.
• atleast 83% of houses do not have bulbs.
• atleast 73% of houses do not have fans.
What percentage of houses have
(i) all three items tubelight, bulb and fan missing?
(ii)exactly 2 items missing?


I think there is something wrong with the words used. If you use "at least 67%" that doesn't tell me anything. It could be 100% of houses do not have tubelights because 100% is at least 67%. I don't think it can be answered definitively as written.


Nope. There is no verbiage error here. Let us start this way..Assume Every house in the village has all the three items
tubelight, bulb and fan. Now based on the given data , eliminate all possible exceptions to the above assumption. 19% of them do not have just one of the three.So remove 19 items from the total.

I have the solution..will post in 2 days.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 77 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
 Q49  V44
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
chan4312 wrote:
jallenmorris wrote:
chan4312 wrote:
allen,
Have u heard this problem .? Let us try this one.
See if we can get it solved without any visual diagrams.

There is a shortage of tubelights, bulbs and fans in a village. It is found that
• All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan.
• exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of these.
• atleast 67% of houses do not have tubelights.
• atleast 83% of houses do not have bulbs.
• atleast 73% of houses do not have fans.
What percentage of houses have
(i) all three items tubelight, bulb and fan missing?
(ii)exactly 2 items missing?


I think there is something wrong with the words used. If you use "at least 67%" that doesn't tell me anything. It could be 100% of houses do not have tubelights because 100% is at least 67%. I don't think it can be answered definitively as written.


Nope. There is no verbiage error here. Let us start this way..Assume Every house in the village has all the three items
tubelight, bulb and fan. Now based on the given data , eliminate all possible exceptions to the above assumption. 19% of them do not have just one of the three.So remove 19 items from the total.

I have the solution..will post in 2 days.


I have to agree with jallen, something doesn't seem right with this question - unless I'm just blanking... which is also possible.

For example, if I say 81% of them have no items (and at least 2% has just bulbs missing), then it matches all conditions you've given.
If I say 80% of them have no items (and at least 3% has jus bulbs missing), it still matches all conditions you've given, no?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 321 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
chan4312 wrote:
jallenmorris wrote:
chan4312 wrote:
allen,
Have u heard this problem .? Let us try this one.
See if we can get it solved without any visual diagrams.

There is a shortage of tubelights, bulbs and fans in a village. It is found that
• All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan.
• exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of these.
• atleast 67% of houses do not have tubelights.
• atleast 83% of houses do not have bulbs.
• atleast 73% of houses do not have fans.
What percentage of houses have
(i) all three items tubelight, bulb and fan missing?
(ii)exactly 2 items missing?


I think there is something wrong with the words used. If you use "at least 67%" that doesn't tell me anything. It could be 100% of houses do not have tubelights because 100% is at least 67%. I don't think it can be answered definitively as written.


Nope. There is no verbiage error here. Let us start this way..Assume Every house in the village has all the three items
tubelight, bulb and fan. Now based on the given data , eliminate all possible exceptions to the above assumption. 19% of them do not have just one of the three.So remove 19 items from the total.

I have the solution..will post in 2 days.


Ok here it comes.
Let us assume that there are 100 houses in the village..So Assume that all 100 houses have tubelights, bulbs and fans. So that would be 300 items there.

we know that there is shortage of atleast (67+83+73) 223 items in every 100 houses.


Given that exactly 19% of houses do not have just one of those 3 items , we can remove 19 items from the total..Now we account for 204 missing items in 81 houses... right.!
So 81 houses are missing exactly 2 items or all missing.
If 81 houses are missing all 3 items then total missing items will be 81*3=243
But we only have 204 missing items. So 81 houses missing 2 items each will account for 81*2=162 items missing .

204 - 162= 42 missed items left over. So 42 items are missing means 42% houses do not have all the three items.

I got this question and its solution online. I did not solve it.
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
what's the source of this question? the wording is strange and it's wording that you'd never see on a real GMAT question "do not have just" makes me think it was certainly not written by GMAT authors.

The wording is confusing and you can't really tell what the question is asking.

"All houses do not have either tubelight or bulb or fan."

What does this really mean? Is "do not have" supposed to mean missing or non-working? Does it mean the house never had one or more of these items to begin with. It makes me think that the authors of this intended "do not have" to mean "missing" or "not working" but that's a meaning that isn't clear. "do not have" is usually used with regard to possession. Such as "I do not have a dog." It seems like with the way the phrase is used here, the authors mean the dog is missing, which implies that I had a dog to begin with. The phrase "I do not have a dog." does not support the assumption that I did have a dog but now I do not have one becuase the dog is missing. Same idea applies here. If the houses do not have either tubelights, bulb, or fan, that does not mean the houses DID have one but now they are missing or not working.

I think this is a very poorly written question.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 321 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
This is not a GMAT question.It is one of the puzzles in this document.
https://www.fresherscircle.com/files/Puzzles9.doc

Help your self.

Sonics is gone man.! Get over it..Let us cheer for Team USA in Olympics. :)

Originally posted by chan4312 on 12 Aug 2008, 06:37.
Last edited by chan4312 on 12 Aug 2008, 06:39, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
Sonics is gone man.! Get over it..

In case you didn't see where I'm from, I living in Oklahoma City. We're the team GETTING the Sonics franchise and I couldn't be happier. There is nothing to get over.

chan4312 wrote:
This is not a GMAT question.It is one of the puzzles in this document.
https://www.fresherscircle.com/files/Puzzles9.doc

Help your self.

Sonics is gone man.! Get over it..Let us cheer for Team USA in Olympics.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 321 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
Well that is great. I did not notice that. Kevin Durant is here
Reading that the Sonics don't live in Seattle anymore: Priceless.

Should not this be like this ?
Reading that the Sonics coming to Oklahoma : Priceless.

Well anyway ...Houses don't have those items. it does not mean they are broken. They are not present. Those might be using some other things. a house may be missing 1 , 2 or 3 items.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: I was reading one of walker's posts today and something [#permalink]
Moderator:
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne