Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Preparing for the GMAT? Avoid these 5 major mistakes that can lower your score and hurt your MBA dreams. In this expert panel discussion, 4 top GMAT coaches - GMAT Ninja, Jeff Miller from TTP, Rida Shafiq from eGMAT, and Chris Gentry from Manhattan Prep
What happens after getting an MBA? Is it worth the investment? To find out, I interviewed 10 GMAT Club professionals who have completed their MBAs and built careers in consulting, finance, tech, and entrepreneurship. Their answers might surprise you!
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
We know Strengthen and Weaken questions account for more than 50% of the CR questions on the GMAT. With CR becoming even more important on GMAT Focus, it's time you strengthen your weaknesses with an approach that improves your solving time and accuracy!
The Target Test Prep team has recently introduced TTP OnDemand GMAT, a 400-hour live masterclass video course created by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder and CEO of Target Test Prep.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
21%
(02:54)
correct 79%
(01:26)
wrong
based on 33
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was approximately times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was approximately times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Drop-down 1:
Assuming the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was 100 \(unit^2\) in 1982, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) would be 50 \(unit^2\) in the same year. From the graph, we see that the rural areas of both Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) increased by 40%, so in 1997, the combined rural area would become 140 \(unit^2\). Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 37.5 \(unit^2\). Therefore, in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was \(\frac{140}{37.5} \approx 4\) times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
Drop-down 2:
Delaware's cropland decreased by 35% from 1982 to 1997, so 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{380,000}{0.65} \approx 585,000\) acres. During the same period, Maryland's (MD) cropland decreased by 10%, so 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{500,000}{0.90} \approx 555,000\) acres. Therefore, in 1982, Delaware had approximately 30,000 acres more cropland than Maryland.
the system time shows 2 mins, i have spent over 5 minutes on this and still got it wrong, how are people getting it correctly ? could someone give me tips to improve speed in this type of heavy graph data questions
the system time shows 2 mins, i have spent over 5 minutes on this and still got it wrong, how are people getting it correctly ? could someone give me tips to improve speed in this type of heavy graph data questions
Hi Bunuel . I have always the following question: ¿Is it not the correct answer three times larger? I say this because two times larger means actually three times the original verions, the same with 1 time larger, it would be actually twice the original. For example : The phrase "two times larger" means the circle's area is three times the area of the square because "two times larger" implies 2 times more in addition to the original (1x).
This is actually a matter of phrasing, because I always remember that was my mystake when I was a child, whenever you see x times larger it is actually that in addition to the original .. Pleas..
Please correct me if that rule does not follow in the actual gmat.. Thanks
Hi Bunuel . I have always the following question: ¿Is it not the correct answer three times larger? I say this because two times larger means actually three times the original verions, the same with 1 time larger, it would be actually twice the original. For example : The phrase "two times larger" means the circle's area is three times the area of the square because "two times larger" implies 2 times more in addition to the original (1x).
This is actually a matter of phrasing, because I always remember that was my mystake when I was a child, whenever you see x times larger it is actually that in addition to the original .. Pleas..
Please correct me if that rule does not follow in the actual gmat.. Thanks
No, that's not correct.
Here is my post from another topic addressing this issue:
Agree that it's confusing but check below:
Merriam Webster's Dictionary of English Usage:
The argument in this case is that times more (or times larger, times stronger, times brighter, etc.) is ambiguous, so that "He has five times more money than you" can be misunderstood as meaning "He has six times as much money as you." It is, in fact, possible to misunderstand times more in this way, but it takes a good deal of effort. If you have $100, five times that is $500, which means that "five times more than $100" can mean (the commentators claim) "$500 more than $100," which equals "$600," which equals "six times as much as $100." The commentators regard this as a serious ambiguity, and they advise you to avoid it by always saying "times as much" instead of "times more." Here again, it seems that they are paying homage to mathematics at the expense of language. The fact is that "five times more" and "five times as much" are idiomatic phrases which have - and are understood to have - exactly the same meaning.
The "ambiguity" of times more is imaginary: in the world of actual speech and writing, the meaning of times more is clear and unequivocal. It is an idiom that has existed in our language for more than four centuries, and there is no real reason to avoid its use.
ethanhunt007 Hi, I have an issue with the phrase "greater than"
If I say X is twice of Y, then it should mean --> X = 2Y If I say X is two times greater than Y, shouldn't it mean --> X = 3Y
There seems to be some confusion about this earlier in this thread. The phrase "X is 2 times greater than Y" simply means that X = 2Y. It's understandable that this might seem confusing, because if instead we say "X is 200% greater than Y" we definitely mean that X = 3Y, but this all boils down to idiomatic usage in English. If you think of smaller numbers, it might be clear this is how the phrase is used in the language (there's a reason you've never heard anyone say "X is 1 times greater than Y" to mean that X is twice as big as Y), and it's also what the dictionary says, as quoted at this link:
Got Admitted to MBA program? Join us on Apr 3 & Apr 10 to discover how to choose the right MBA, finance it, and meet McKinsey and Amazon recruiters!