I27-09

Question

In response to increasing environmental concerns and new government regulations, Woodchuck Timber Co. is implementing sustainable logging practices. This includes using lower-impact logging machinery and reserving additional land for reforestation efforts. These changes will improve our public image and align us with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially opening us up for subsidies and grants from governmental environmental agencies. However, be aware that sustainable methods are more costly, both in terms of purchasing eco-friendly machinery and the additional space required for conservation. Despite these costs, I believe this is a crucial step for our future growth and approval rates with both the public and government.

Which of the following statements from the information best supports the argument for adopting sustainable practices?

	Woodchuck Timber Co. will likely qualify for grants from environmental agencies.
	Sustainable practices could lead to reduced regulatory fines and penalties over time.
	There is a significant annual increase in operating costs due to eco-friendly equipment and conservation land.
	Traditional practices are less costly and require fewer resources than sustainable practices.
	Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially improving its reputation.

Show Answer

Official Answer

Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially improving its reputation.

Bunuel · Answer

Official Solution:

The question asks us to find which statement best supports the argument for adopting sustainable practices.
 
 - Woodchuck Timber Co. will likely qualify for grants from environmental agencies.  Email 2 does say:  “we estimate that Woodchuck Timber Co. will qualify for approximately $70,000 in grants per year.”  However, this isn’t the reason why the company is adopting sustainable practices in the first place. So,  this statement doesn’t work. 
 
 - Sustainable practices could lead to reduced regulatory fines and penalties over time.  Email 2 says that this is true:  “there may be long-term savings as sustainable practices could reduce regulatory fines and penalties.”  However, once again, this isn’t the reason why the company is adopting sustainable practices in the first place. So,  this statement doesn’t work. 
 
 - There is a significant annual increase in operating costs due to eco-friendly equipment and conservation land.  This is rather a negative behind adopting sustainable practices. So,  this statement doesn’t work. 
 
 - Traditional practices are less costly and require fewer resources than sustainable practices.  Here, it can be used as a negative for adopting sustainable practices. So,  this statement doesn’t work. 
 
 - Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially improving its reputation.  In Email 1, the CEO said that:  “I believe this is a crucial step for our future growth and approval rates with both the public and government.”  The statement is essentially the corollary. So,  this statement works.

Correct answer:

Which of the following statements from the information best supports the argument for adopting sustainable practices?  "Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially improving its reputation."

agrasan · Answer

Hi  KarishmaB   MartyMurray

In question-2, I understand how (E) is a good choice but unable to eliminate (A).

Could you please help me understand why (A) is not a suitable choice here? Is (A) not the answer because it is ultimately the effect of (E) because email-1 says:

Sustainable changes --> Public Image + Green Lumber Certification program --> Grants from government

Which of the following statements from the information best supports the argument for adopting sustainable practices? 
(A) Woodchuck Timber Co. will likely qualify for grants from environmental agencies.
(B) Sustainable practices could lead to reduced regulatory fines and penalties over time.
(C) There is a significant annual increase in operating costs due to eco-friendly equipment and conservation land.
(D) Traditional practices are less costly and require fewer resources than sustainable practices.
(E) Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program, potentially improving its reputation.

Bunuel · Answer

(A) is a possible downstream benefit (they “may” qualify and it “potentially” opens grants), not the core rationale in the argument. The CEO’s stated reason is certification alignment and reputation/approval, so (E) best supports the argument, while (A) is secondary and conditional.

kabirgandhi · Answer

Hey  Bunuel ,  bb

Thanks for the explanation above. One question on this, though:  Sustainable practices align the company with the Green Lumber Certification program,  potentially  improving its reputation.

Choice E contains the word potentially as well, making it seem a bit difficult to choose over A. There is nothing more in the passage that makes this sure to be true.

At the end, we are comparing: 1) Potential of receiving government grants vs 2) Potential of reputational improvement & around a 5% sales increase., since neither of them is sure.

In my head, I was thinking that since the probability of neither of these is 1, we must look at a higher expected return, given the sub-1 probability that they could get.

If 1) gets $10 with a 0.5 probability and 2) gets $5 with a 0.5 probability, that would make 1 the obvious choice, hence, chose A). However this seems a bit flawed to me, please let me know what you guys think

Bunuel · Answer

You are treating it like an expected value problem, but that is not what the question asks. The company’s stated argument is about certification and reputation. Grants are only a possible downstream benefit. That is why E, not A, best supports the argument. I tried elaborating on this above as well.

I27-09

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards