Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 18 Jul 2019, 20:51 ### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

#### Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.  # If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern  B
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Posts: 27
If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1 00:00

Difficulty:   25% (medium)

Question Stats: 70% (01:01) correct 30% (01:09) wrong based on 98 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics If a < 0, is b < 0 ?

(1) b/a > 0
(2) a - b > 0

I understand why Statement 1 is sufficient, but do not understand how Statement 2 is sufficient.

I chose A which is wrong. The correct answer is below.

Originally posted by kritikalal on 14 Jan 2018, 08:27.
Last edited by Bunuel on 14 Jan 2018, 08:30, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56257
Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
kritikalal wrote:
If a < 0, is b < 0 ?

(1) b/a > 0
(2) a - b > 0

I understand why Statement 1 is sufficient, but do not understand how Statement 2 is sufficient.

I chose A which is wrong. The correct answer is below.

If a < 0, is b < 0 ?

(1) b/a > 0. This implies that a and b have the same sign. Since it's given that a is negative, then b must be negative too. Sufficient.

(2) a - b > 0. Re-arrange: a > b. Given that 0 > a, so 0 > a > b. Sufficient.

_________________
Manager  D
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 236
Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1) B/A> 0. Either both A and B are negative or both are positive. A is Negative then so is B . Sufficient.

2) a - b > 0 = a> b, a is negative so, b is also negative as b is smaller than a. Sufficient

Ans: D
_________________
We Shall Overcome... One day... V
Status: Preparing for GMAT
Joined: 25 Nov 2015
Posts: 1028
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

kritikalal wrote:
If a < 0, is b < 0 ?

(1) b/a > 0
(2) a - b > 0

I understand why Statement 1 is sufficient, but do not understand how Statement 2 is sufficient.

I chose A which is wrong. The correct answer is below.

a<0 i.e. a is negative.
S1 = b/a > 0 therefore, b also must be negative for b/a to be positive.
b<0 . Sufficient.
S2 = a - b > 0
i.e. a>b (Adding b to both sides, because adding or subtracting variables in both sides of inequalities is allowed, but multiplication or division is not allowed, if we don't know the sign of the variables - Refer to Inequalities theory for more details)
Since a<0, b must be <0, because a>b.
Sufficient.
_________________
Please give kudos, if you like my post

When the going gets tough, the tough gets going...
Intern  B
Joined: 26 Aug 2017
Posts: 3
Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Is it possible on gmat test to divide "0" by any given number (except 0 itself)?

If it is possible, then statement 1 would imply that B can also be "0" and it would not be possible to determine if b<0.

Best,
Jakub
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56257
Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Phlaryu wrote:
Is it possible on gmat test to divide "0" by any given number (except 0 itself)?

If it is possible, then statement 1 would imply that B can also be "0" and it would not be possible to determine if b<0.

Best,
Jakub

(1) says that b/a > 0, which implies that a and b have the same sign. Since it's given that a is negative, then b must be negative too. Sufficient.

Here b cannot be 0 because if it were then b/a would equal to 0 and not greater than 0.
_________________ Re: If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0   [#permalink] 27 Feb 2018, 10:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# If a < 0, is b < 0 ? (1) b/a > 0 (2) a - b > 0  