Quote:
If an external force intervenes to give members of a community political self-determination, then that political community will almost surely fail to be truly free, since it is during the people's struggle to become free by their own efforts that the political virtues necessary for maintaining freedom have the best chance of arising.
Premise: some political virtues are necessary for freedom
conclusion: External source provides self determination
≠ free The reasoning above conforms most closely to which one of the following principles?
(A) Political freedom is a virtue that a community can attain through an external force.
(B) Self-determination is not the first political virtue that the members of a community achieve in their struggle to become free.
(C) A community cannot remain free without first having developed certain political virtues.
[Straight from the premise](D) Political self-determination is required if a community is to remain truly free. [
Argument says just the opposite: community having political self-determination by external factor will almost surely fail to be truly free]
(E) Real freedom should not be imposed on a community by external forces. [
Argument says external force shouldn't give political self determination. It doesn't say anything for "Real freedom" for which as mentioned in the premise some political virtues are necessary.]