I agree , sum of first and last term is not enough to give the number of consecutive terms in a sequence
but we are given more than that, we are given 19 * ( F +T) this immediately forced me to tell that there are 38 consecutive terms in the sequence .
because 19(F+T) can we written as 38/2(F+T) which can be compared to n/2(F+T) I know 19 can we written in other forms as well but our aim is to get it in the form n/2 where n is a integer.
If I was given 20 *(F+T) and we were dealing with consecutive terms then could I not tell there are 40 terms in the sequence, by changing eqn. to 40/2(F+L)?
So F+T = 1729/19 if we look at this form of the equation , then certainly this seems insufficient
but after algebraic manipulation we get the equation in the form 19(F+T) = 1729 this form seems sufficient
I have learnt that in algebraic manipulation the same equation in certain form can give the answer well as in other forms it may not give the answer.
F+L = 1729/19 = insufficient but 19( F+T) = 1729 or (38/2) (F+L) = 1729 or (n/2)(F+L) is sufficient.
Is there a possibility that this could be a case here? Is there an issue of algebraic manipulation
Thank you for trying to make me understand.