Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 08:16 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 08:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
rush123
Joined: 28 May 2017
Last visit: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 22
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Applicant4991
Joined: 13 Apr 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2025
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V37 (Online)
GPA: 3.69
WE:Consulting (Internet and New Media)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Applicant4991
Hi Everyone,

I did try to understand all the other explanations.

However I am still not able to solve a scenario based on statement II wherein if we assume angle ABC to be 45 degrees. (Considering any angle can be 45)

In case of the above assumption I suppose we cannot get a 45-45-90 triangle.

Please let me know what is the flaw in my above assumption.
From statement 1. It's given that the height of parallelogram is 10 (since base is 10) but we can't determine the length of slant height of parallelogram without knowing anything about the angles.
A is not sufficient.

Statement B states one of the angle of parallelogram is 45°
Since there are two equal acute angles in parallelogram and 2 equal obtuse angles. Here B and D are acute angles of 45°
You can see and analyze which angle will be acute of obtuse for this.
Back to question.
The length of base could be 100 and height 1 or vice versa or both could be 10 each.
There are 3 possible answers here.
Not sufficient.

Adding both statements together,
We get this diagram type structure.
Pardon for my screen scribbling. It's definitely not good. But I hope you get the diagram.

We can analyse the slant height of parallelogram using right angle triangle property.
That's why answer is C

Hope this helps.

Posted from my mobile device
Attachments

IMG_20210830_174424.jpg
IMG_20210830_174424.jpg [ 67.18 KiB | Viewed 1379 times ]

avatar
rgreenhill
Joined: 04 Apr 2021
Last visit: 31 Dec 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 13
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

here is a video answer for anyone interested! :)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 39,003
Own Kudos:
Posts: 39,003
Kudos: 1,122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
110008 posts
498 posts
212 posts