It is currently 20 Sep 2017, 09:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If the government increases its funding for civilian

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5210

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

If the government increases its funding for civilian [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2006, 23:59
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If the government increases its funding for civilian scientific research, private patrons and industries will believe that such research has become primarily the governmentâ€™s responsibility. When they believe that research is no longer primarily their responsibility, private patrons and industries will decrease their contributions toward research. Therefore, in order to keep from depressing the overall level of funding for civilian scientific research, the government should not increase its own funding.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) Governments should bear the majority of the financial burden of funding for civilian scientific research.
(B) Any increase in government funding would displace more private funding for civilian scientific research than it would provide.
(C) Private donations toward research are no longer welcomed by researchers whose work receives government funding.
(D) Civilian scientific research cannot be conducted efficiently with more than one source of funding.
(E) funding for civilian scientific research is currently at the highest possible level.

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1685

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 00:22
"B" is the best!

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 00:34
After about 2 minutes I finally got B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 313 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 02:58
Yep B. Mostly used POE to eliminate other choices and tried to justify B in the following way.

Total funding = Govt funding + Private funding
Conclusion specifically says Total funding is depressed if Govt increases the funding. This can be true only if for every \$x increase Govt's funding, Private funding reduces by >\$x.

The premises are strong, but the conclusion is weak without the assumption.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 78

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 07:57
It is B. It is from "in order to keep from depressing the overall level of funding for civilian scientific research" that B is the most obvious.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 16:09
Did a negation and B stood out.. 1.5 min

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2006, 23:22
Agree B it is
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5210

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2006, 09:31
Good work gand, OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2006, 10:45
late but B. stand out....

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281

Kudos [?]: 475 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2006, 14:48
Economic Perspective: Crowding Out

Assertion: Govt. funds will crowd out (displace) private investment

Underlying Assumpting: More private funds will be displaced than those funds added by the government

Kudos [?]: 475 [0], given: 0

28 Jan 2006, 14:48
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 0 10 Jul 2008, 13:45
Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds 0 08 Dec 2015, 15:16
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving 0 08 Jun 2017, 14:48
1 The city government should invest surplus funds in improving 16 12 Sep 2011, 20:00
If the government increases its funding for civilian 6 07 Jun 2009, 09:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by