Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 16:48 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 16:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
barakhaiev
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Last visit: 22 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
581
 [34]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv
Concentration: BBA, Finance
 Q39  V21 GMAT 2: 640  Q45  V33
GPA: 3.79
Posts: 58
Kudos: 581
 [34]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Economist
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Last visit: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
4,400
 [8]
Given Kudos: 18
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Posts: 383
Kudos: 4,400
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
bsv180985
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Last visit: 21 Nov 2011
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
998
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
 Q50  V36
Posts: 44
Kudos: 998
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
speeddeamon
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
76
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Schools:Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
 Q48  V47 GMAT 2: 680  Q49  V34
GPA: 78
Posts: 27
Kudos: 76
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My ans is D.
If the rate of wear can be predicted, there is no need for monitoring.
User avatar
gurpreet07
Joined: 23 May 2008
Last visit: 04 Sep 2011
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
1,829
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 222
Kudos: 1,829
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO D......

if the rate is predictable, the essence of automated equipment to monitor the needles is not required.
User avatar
gmattokyo
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 212
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 212
Kudos: 1,718
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.

Thatswhy a sophisticated acoustic device is needed. Otherwise a periodic replacement would have been fine.
Not E because there is no mention that worn out needles produce higher level of noise (maybe the device just detects some disruptions in continuity).
User avatar
BM
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Last visit: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 1,505
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Status:Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Posts: 1,505
Kudos: 1,173
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option D is the best answer. If needles wore out at predictable time intervals, then there would be no need for workers or machines to monitor them.
avatar
hien48
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Last visit: 16 Mar 2012
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I go for D.
A, B, C, E are unconvincing therefore they must be eleminated, leaving D.
User avatar
TGC
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 581
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 581
Kudos: 3,491
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) In automated apparel factories, items will be ruined by faulty needles less frequently than happens in traditional apparel factories.
(B) In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.

Why not (B).Although it works as an assumption, it also strengthens the argument by stating that each person can perform only one task so there is no use of keeping one person just for this task.


(C) Traditional apparel factories do not use any automated equipment.
(D) The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.
(E) As sewing machine needles become worn, the noise they make becomes increasingly loud.


Plz Advice !!!
avatar
Pyus
Joined: 18 Nov 2012
Last visit: 03 Dec 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
targetgmatchotu
(A) In automated apparel factories, items will be ruined by faulty needles less frequently than happens in traditional apparel factories.
(B) In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.

Why not (B).Although it works as an assumption, it also strengthens the argument by stating that each person can perform only one task so there is no use of keeping one person just for this task.


(C) Traditional apparel factories do not use any automated equipment.
(D) The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.
(E) As sewing machine needles become worn, the noise they make becomes increasingly loud.


Plz Advice !!!

Hi,
(my first post :) )

With the onset of automated factories, the traditional work of sewing will be performed by machines. So, the only remaining work left will be monitoring and replacing worn out needles. This work can be performed in following two ways -

    1. Human intervention - The comprehension mentions this as an unfavorable situation since the person would be just monitoring the condition of needles (single item of work)
    2. Machines - This would be favorable outcome as it will achieve the purpose of automation.

Now, you should be able to see that B) is out of sync with the comprehension. It invokes a wrong context.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,116
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,116
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
barakhaiev
If the needle on an industrial sewing machine becomes badly worn, the article being sewn can be ruined. In traditional apparel factories, the people who operate the sewing machines monitor the needles and replace those that begin to wear out. Industrial sewing operations are becoming increasingly automated, however, and it would be inefficient for a factory to hire people for the sole purpose of monitoring needles. Therefore a sophisticated new acoustic device that detects wear in sewing machine needles is expected to become standard equipment in the automated apparel factories of the future.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) In automated apparel factories, items will be ruined by faulty needles less frequently than happens in traditional apparel factories.
(B) In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.
(C) Traditional apparel factories do not use any automated equipment.
(D) The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.
(E) As sewing machine needles become worn, the noise they make becomes increasingly loud.
fameatop
Hi Mike, Although I got the correct answer, i couldn't get why option E is incorrect. Waiting for reply. Regards, Fame
We want to know which of the five answer is "most strongly supported by" the passage. In other words, what's the most justified conclusion we can draw?

We know they are bring in "a sophisticated new acoustic device", which suggests the change in the needles will be detected via some sort of sound. But, do we know that it's a loud sound? Or, does the worn out needle change its sound in some other way, such as a higher pitch frequency or something like that. In a way, the fact that the need a "sophisticated" device suggests that the change in sound might be something unapparent to the ordinary ear. We certainly do not have evidence that the needles get "increasingly loud" as they wear out. That's why (E) cannot be correct.

Does that make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
hoangyenle
Joined: 22 Feb 2014
Last visit: 10 Apr 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 6
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
barakhaiev
If the needle on an industrial sewing machine becomes badly worn, the article being sewn can be ruined. In traditional apparel factories, the people who operate the sewing machines monitor the needles and replace those that begin to wear out. Industrial sewing operations are becoming increasingly automated, however, and it would be inefficient for a factory to hire people for the sole purpose of monitoring needles. Therefore a sophisticated new acoustic device that detects wear in sewing machine needles is expected to become standard equipment in the automated apparel factories of the future.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) In automated apparel factories, items will be ruined by faulty needles less frequently than happens in traditional apparel factories.
(B) In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.
(C) Traditional apparel factories do not use any automated equipment.
(D) The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.
(E) As sewing machine needles become worn, the noise they make becomes increasingly loud.
fameatop
Hi Mike, Although I got the correct answer, i couldn't get why option E is incorrect. Waiting for reply. Regards, Fame
We want to know which of the five answer is "most strongly supported by" the passage. In other words, what's the most justified conclusion we can draw?

We know they are bring in "a sophisticated new acoustic device", which suggests the change in the needles will be detected via some sort of sound. But, do we know that it's a loud sound? Or, does the worn out needle change its sound in some other way, such as a higher pitch frequency or something like that. In a way, the fact that the need a "sophisticated" device suggests that the change in sound might be something unapparent to the ordinary ear. We certainly do not have evidence that the needles get "increasingly loud" as they wear out. That's why (E) cannot be correct.

Does that make sense?
Mike :-)

Hi Mike

Can you help to explain why B is incorrect. I'm not really satisfied with all the explanation above.

B)
" Industrial sewing operations are becoming increasingly automated, however, and it would be inefficient for a factory to hire people for the sole purpose of monitoring needles."
==> Paraphrasing:
In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task.

Hence, I think B is correct

D)The needles of industrial sewing machines wear out at unpredictable rates.

The premises just stated that "the people who operate the sewing machines monitor the needles and replace those that begin to wear out" without mentioning about the unexpected rate. It is possible that at the expected rate , we still need worker to monitor and replace the needles??

Thanks :)

YL
User avatar
plumber250
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Last visit: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
951
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Posts: 220
Kudos: 951
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi YL,

Let me see if I can take that one.

In the sort of question that this is 'support'. What I generally advise is to work out what the paragraph is saying in simple terms and then do 2 things.

1) Work out if each option choice is talking about the same thing (often choices are irrelevant.

2) If it is relevant, work out if it supports or goes against the paragraph.

In this example:

The paragraph says:
-Worn needles ruin clothes.
-People used to operate the machines and check for this themselves
-Now the factory is automated, it is not cost efficient to employ someone for one task
-So the solution is a new bit of technology.

Option B says:
- In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task

or in simple terms, in automated factories, everyone does only one type of job.

My analysis:

I would call this irrelevant. The question is about one particular factory and one particular task, this talks about factories in general and 'each' employee. You can't extrapolate from the one to the other.

In addition, it's not clear that even if you ignore this, that B supports the passage. Where does it say in the passage about employees only doing one thing? It simply says they can't do one particular job in a cost effective manner.

I hope that helps.

James
User avatar
vards
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Last visit: 21 Jun 2025
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 622
Status:PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Mannheim
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22
GPA: 3.1
Schools: Mannheim
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22
Posts: 107
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plumber250
Hi YL,

Let me see if I can take that one.

In the sort of question that this is 'support'. What I generally advise is to work out what the paragraph is saying in simple terms and then do 2 things.

1) Work out if each option choice is talking about the same thing (often choices are irrelevant.

2) If it is relevant, work out if it supports or goes against the paragraph.

In this example:

The paragraph says:
-Worn needles ruin clothes.
-People used to operate the machines and check for this themselves
-Now the factory is automated, it is not cost efficient to employ someone for one task
-So the solution is a new bit of technology.

Option B says:
- In the automated apparel factories of the future, each employee will perform only one type of task

or in simple terms, in automated factories, everyone does only one type of job.

My analysis:

I would call this irrelevant. The question is about one particular factory and one particular task, this talks about factories in general and 'each' employee. You can't extrapolate from the one to the other.

In addition, it's not clear that even if you ignore this, that B supports the passage. Where does it say in the passage about employees only doing one thing? It simply says they can't do one particular job in a cost effective manner.

I hope that helps.

James


Hello,
as per the passage,v can say that the shift to automated machiner is bcz the traditional method of monitoring is not cost efficient...
there can bean exception to opt.D...


theres no mention of consistency of the needles wearing out...it may happen that needles might be wearing out in predictable time,bt since use of workers in that situation is not cost efficient,the firm has shifted to machinery...so this option D might be true bt not essentially true..


please help me out with this :)
avatar
Amit1408GMAThunk
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Last visit: 10 Nov 2014
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 34
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It was clearly between the options B and D.

Option B is cancelled out as first and foremost in an automated sewing factories, we dont know as to whether they are hiring human employees and if hired, what type of a job is been done by each one of them.

As it is clearly mentioned that in the stimulus that there is monitoring required in order to check whether the needles are worn out or not, then we can infer that
the needles become worn-out at unpredictable times.

Hope the above explanation helps.

Thanks!
avatar
pradeepgontla
Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Last visit: 06 May 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 31
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I've seen some one asking why not B, Let me explain why B is a wrong answer.

- We clearly know the traditional industries don't have a automated sewing machine, Consider a situation where traditional industry has an automated machine for some other use apart from sewing then this option will not stand.
avatar
NeoNguyen1989
Joined: 18 Nov 2018
Last visit: 06 May 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Posts: 84
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D IMO.

If the needles wear out at predictable rate, the industrial operations would not need the device to detect the worn out needles; rather, they will change the needles at a frequency.

E is very close. However, the fact that the factories need sophisticated acoustic device mean that the noise is not a recognisable loud level; rather, the noise might be at high pitch frequency that normal ears can't detect.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,446
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,446
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7353 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts