Last visit was: 12 Sep 2024, 03:13 It is currently 12 Sep 2024, 03:13
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# If x > 0, is x/y > x ?

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2009
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [10]
Given Kudos: 1
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 155 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Concentration: General
Schools:LBS
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95475
Own Kudos [?]: 657852 [1]
Given Kudos: 87247
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Accounting
Schools:NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Hi Bunuel!

How did you so quickly come to this conclusion that "for all other values of 'y' the equation 'x(1-y)/y' will be '-ve'?

Also, how can I strengthen my inequalitites knowledge (for GMAT).

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95475
Own Kudos [?]: 657852 [3]
Given Kudos: 87247
3
Kudos
Syed
Hi Bunuel!

How did you so quickly come to this conclusion that "for all other values of 'y' the equation 'x(1-y)/y' will be '-ve'?

Also, how can I strengthen my inequalitites knowledge (for GMAT).

OK, first of all get rid of x, it's positive thus won't affect anything in the case of sign. We have (1-y)/y: even not doing any deep inquires it's obvious that we have an inequality with y and knowing nothing about it, so we can not conclude whether (1-y)/y positive or not. But if we just for practice want to determine when inequality (1-y)/y>0 holds true we can do the following:

We have 1-y and y, thus we have two check points 1 and 0 (check points y-1=0 --> y=1 and y=0). We should check three cases for (1-y)/y:

1. y<0 --> denominator y is negative, nominator is positive 1-negative=1+positive=positive, so (1-y)/y negative (positive/negative=negative)

2. 0<y<1 --> denominator y is positive, nominator also positive 1-positive number less than 1=positive, so (1-y)/y positive (positive/positive)

3. y>1 --> denominator y is positive, nominator is negative 1-positive number more than 1=negative, so (1-y)/y negative (negative/positive)

We have that (1-y)/y (and thus x(1-y)/y) is positive when y is in range (0;1) and negative when y<0 or y>1.

So statement (2) gives us two scenarios for x(1-y)/y, hence not sufficient.

Hope now it's clear.
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Accounting
Schools:NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Indeed! It is clear. Thanks again!
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 1287 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
Schools:RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Q49  V35
Quick question - couldn't we simply rewrite the question to determine y?

$$X/y>x$$ could be simply rewritten as $$x/x>y$$and therefore is $$1>y$$?

1- Tells us y is less than 1
2 - Tell us nothing about Y

Therefore A?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95475
Own Kudos [?]: 657852 [1]
Given Kudos: 87247
1
Kudos
hogann
Quick question - couldn't we simply rewrite the question to determine y?

$$X/y>x$$ could be simply rewritten as $$x/x>y$$and therefore is $$1>y$$?

1- Tells us y is less than 1
2 - Tell us nothing about Y

Therefore A?

x>0, (x/y)>x can be simplified this way x(1-y)/y>0 --> as x>0 it doesn't affect the sign of x(1-y)/y>0, so we can get rid of it --> (1-y)/y>0. This is maximum we can to do before considering the statements.

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 1287 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
Schools:RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Q49  V35
Bunuel

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.

Exactly which is where the conditions 1 and 2 come in. Since we don't know the sign we are now asking.

Is 1 > y?

Condition 1 says yes
Condition 2 mentions nothing about Y

Is 1 > y is much easier to answer than is (x/y)>y
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 95475
Own Kudos [?]: 657852 [1]
Given Kudos: 87247
1
Kudos
hogann
Bunuel

We can NO WAY rewrite x>0, (x/y)>x as "x/x>y --> 1>y" Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.

Exactly which is where the conditions 1 and 2 come in. Since we don't know the sign we are now asking.

Is 1 > y?

Condition 1 says yes
Condition 2 mentions nothing about Y

Is 1 > y is much easier to answer than is (x/y)>y

Not so. Let's consider another example:

Is 1/y>1?

(1) y<0.5
(2) y<0.3

According to your logic you would rewrite the statement "is 1/y>1?" as "is y<1"?

Afterwards you consider the statements:

(1) y<0.5 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.5<1 so sufficient;
(2) y<0.3 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.3<1 so sufficient;

And thus you would answer D, both are sufficient.

BUT it's WRONG: answer to my rearranged question is E not D

In our initial question it just happened to be that the statements given didn't revealed the mistake you've made in simplification, BUT generally your way is not wright. You can not multiply inequality by the variable not knowing the sign of it.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Posts: 117
Own Kudos [?]: 1287 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
Schools:RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Q49  V35
Bunuel

You can not multiply inequality by the variable not knowing the sign of it.

I get this rule now - the simplification only worked because y could not be negative (as indicated in condition 1)

If y was negative the sign would be flipped.

Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2013
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 111 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
considering statement 1, we can say that y>0 and a fraction. As we now know the sign of y we can safe cross multiply. Therefore, the x/y > x evaluates to --> x>xy. If y is a fraction, x is obviously a greater that xy because anything multiplied with fraction is lower than that anything i.e. x. So st1 is sufficient

considering 2 - there is no information given about y so we cannot evaluate and prove x/y > x

Hope it helped

______________________________________
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 68 [2]
Given Kudos: 34
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hi Bunuel, guys,

I have gone through everyone'e explanations and probably have found a easier solution. What do you guys suggest?

If x > 0

We can rephrase x/y > x ---> 1/y > 1 ( since x is positive just dividing x on both sides)

Hence the question is : 1/y > 1

Statement 1:

0 < y < 1

since y is a proper fraction, therefore ---> 1/proper fraction > 1

Statement 2:

x > 1 --- > no mention of x ---> insufficient
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 203
Own Kudos [?]: 573 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
irda
Hi Bunuel, guys,

I have gone through everyone'e explanations and probably have found a easier solution. What do you guys suggest?
If x > 0
We can rephrase x/y > x ---> 1/y > 1 ( since x is positive just dividing x on both sides)
Hence the question is : 1/y > 1
Statement 1:
0 < y < 1
since y is a proper fraction, therefore ---> 1/proper fraction > 1
Statement 2:
x > 1 --- > no mention of x ---> insufficient

I did the same. Is it justified? Experts please comment.
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 34819
Own Kudos [?]: 877 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: If x > 0, is x/y > x ? [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
95475 posts