If x 0, is x/y x ?

Question

If x > 0, is x/y > x ? (1) 0 < y < 1 (2) x > 1

jax91 · Answer

1.) x > 0, 01 . This does not give any info about y. So insufficient. So A.

Bunuel · Answer

Q is if x>0 is(x/y)>x --> x(1-y)/y>0 (1) x>0 (given), 0 both denominator and nominator >0 so x(1-y)/y>0 Sufficient (2) x>1 x(1-y)/y can be <0 and >0 depending on y. 0

Syed · Answer

Hi Bunuel!

How did you so quickly come to this conclusion that "for all other values of 'y' the equation 'x(1-y)/y' will be '-ve'?

Also, how can I strengthen my inequalitites knowledge (for GMAT).

Please explain in detail.

Bunuel · Answer

OK, first of all get rid of x, it's positive thus won't affect anything in the case of sign. We have (1-y)/y: even not doing any deep inquires it's obvious that we have an inequality with y and knowing nothing about it, so we can not conclude whether (1-y)/y positive or not. But if we just for practice want to determine when inequality (1-y)/y>0 holds true we can do the following: We have 1-y and y, thus we have two check points 1 and 0 (check points y-1=0 --> y=1 and y=0 ). We should check three cases for (1-y)/y: 1. y<0 --> denominator y is negative, nominator is positive 1-negative=1+positive=positive, so (1-y)/y negative (positive/negative=negative) 2. 0 denominator y is positive, nominator also positive 1-positive number less than 1=positive, so (1-y)/y positive (positive/positive) 3. y>1 --> denominator y is positive, nominator is negative 1-positive number more than 1=negative, so (1-y)/y negative (negative/positive) We have that (1-y)/y (and thus x(1-y)/y) is positive when y is in range (0;1) and negative when y<0 or y>1. So statement (2) gives us two scenarios for x(1-y)/y, hence not sufficient. Hope now it's clear.

Syed · Answer

Indeed! It is clear. Thanks again!

hogann · Answer

Quick question - couldn't we simply rewrite the question to determine y?

X/y>x  could be simply rewritten as  x/x>y and therefore is  1>y ?

1- Tells us y is less than 1
2 - Tell us nothing about Y

Therefore A?

Bunuel · Answer

x>0, (x/y)>x  can be simplified this way  x(1-y)/y>0  -->  as x>0  it doesn't affect the sign of x(1-y)/y>0, so we can get rid of it -->  (1-y)/y>0 . This is maximum we can to do before considering the statements.

We can NO WAY rewrite  x>0, (x/y)>x  as  "x/x>y --> 1>y"  Because at this stage we don't know the sign of y.

hogann · Answer

Exactly which is where the conditions 1 and 2 come in. Since we don't know the sign we are now asking.

Is 1 > y?

Condition 1 says yes 
Condition 2 mentions nothing about Y

Is 1 > y is much easier to answer than is (x/y)>y

Bunuel · Answer

Not so. Let's consider another example: Is 1/y>1? (1) y<0.5 (2) y<0.3 According to your logic you would rewrite the statement "is 1/y>1?" as "is y<1"? Afterwards you consider the statements: (1) y<0.5 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.5<1 so sufficient; (2) y<0.3 according to your logic you would say: yes y<0.3<1 so sufficient; And thus you would answer D, both are sufficient. BUT it's WRONG: answer to my rearranged question is E not D In our initial question it just happened to be that the statements given didn't revealed the mistake you've made in simplification, BUT generally your way is not wright. You can not multiply inequality by the variable not knowing the sign of it.

hogann · Answer

I get this rule now - the simplification only worked because y could not be negative (as indicated in condition 1)

If y was negative the sign would be flipped.

Thanks for your help!

arakban99 · Answer

considering statement 1, we can say that y>0 and a fraction. As we now know the sign of y we can safe cross multiply. Therefore, the x/y > x evaluates to --> x>xy. If y is a fraction, x is obviously a greater that xy because  anything  multiplied with fraction is lower than that  anything  i.e. x. So st1 is sufficient

considering 2 - there is no information given about y so we cannot evaluate and prove x/y > x

Therefore, answer is A

Hope it helped

______________________________________
 COMMENTS  and  KUDOS  are helpful

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

If x > 0, is x/y > x ?

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions