GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 May 2019, 09:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 90
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2008, 23:59
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:04) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?

Please advise the best way to solve this problem

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 194
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Re: PS (sets)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2008, 00:53
85%
leg is subset of 4 limbs ( i suppose ^^). So those lost 4 limbs sure lost leg
CEO
CEO
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3408
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: PS (sets)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2008, 01:15
az780 wrote:
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?


terrible :(
it is a strange question...
So, 70% an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg.

1. an eye and and an ear: p=[50%,70%]
2. (an eye and and an ear) and an arm: p=[25%,70%]
3. ((an eye and and an ear) and an arm) and a leg: p=[10%,70%]

Therefore, min: 10%, max: 70%
_________________
HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | Limited GMAT/GRE Math tutoring in Chicago
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1611
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: PS (sets)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2008, 02:15
walker wrote:
az780 wrote:
In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg, x% lost all four limbs. The minimum value of x is?


terrible :(
it is a strange question...
So, 70% an eye, 80% an ear, 75% an arm, 85% a leg.

1. an eye and and an ear: p=[50%,70%]
2. (an eye and and an ear) and an arm: p=[25%,70%]
3. ((an eye and and an ear) and an arm) and a leg: p=[10%,70%]

Therefore, min: 10%, max: 70%


This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:
_________________
CEO
CEO
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3408
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: PS (sets)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2008, 02:39
sondenso wrote:
This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:


:)
1. Let we have two attributes: A and B.
2. Let a% of people have A and b% of people have B.
3. we will try to find max and min ab% (the percentage of people that have two attributes)

I'll try to draw:

the maximum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb--------------| 100%
max=min(a,b)

the minimum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|---------------bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb| 100%
min=b-(100-a)=a+b-100. if min<0 then min have to be 0

for example, a=75%, b=87%

max=min(75%,87%)=75%
min=87%-(100%-75%)=62%
_________________
HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | Limited GMAT/GRE Math tutoring in Chicago
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1611
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: PS (sets)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2008, 19:34
walker wrote:
sondenso wrote:
This is really funny problem. I can not stand when I read it. :P :P :P
Anyway, Walker! I try to but can not follow your logic! Sets always make me confused! Please give me some detail. Your approach strange also :lol:


:)
1. Let we have two attributes: A and B.
2. Let a% of people have A and b% of people have B.
3. we will try to find max and min ab% (the percentage of people that have two attributes)

I'll try to draw:

the maximum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb--------------| 100%
max=min(a,b)

the minimum configuration:
|aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa------------------| 100%
|---------------bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb| 100%
min=b-(100-a)=a+b-100. if min<0 then min have to be 0

for example, a=75%, b=87%

max=min(75%,87%)=75%
min=87%-(100%-75%)=62%


Thank you Walker, you are great! :thanks
_________________
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10949
Re: In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2017, 07:39
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,   [#permalink] 06 Jul 2017, 07:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a battle 70% of the combatants lost an eye, 80% an ear,

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.