Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:30 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
linker
Joined: 25 Sep 2004
Last visit: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1,350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guest
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guest
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still go by statement 1 being insuf, because, per statement1 it can also be a parallelogram. So, Statement 1 mean that it can be a parallelogram or it may not be. However statement 2 confirms that the a diagonal and a side is equal and thus the sides are not equal and thus CANNOT be a parallelogram.
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anonymous
I still go by statement 1 being insuf, because, per statement1 it can also be a parallelogram. So, Statement 1 mean that it can be a parallelogram or it may not be. However statement 2 confirms that the a diagonal and a side is equal and thus the sides are not equal and thus CANNOT be a parallelogram.


Why? what about 2 equilateral triangles pushed up together? They make a rhombus, but that IS a parallelgram.
User avatar
Dookie
Joined: 19 May 2004
Last visit: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Posts: 144
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it's E.
Attachments

File comment: Sketch
quad.jpg
quad.jpg [ 6.53 KiB | Viewed 2168 times ]

User avatar
artabro
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Last visit: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Location: London
Posts: 22
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am with Dookie, I think it is E.


Two contiguous isosceles triangles ABC and ACD sharing side AC and with AB=AC=AD fulfil 1 and 2 conditions.
Attachments

drawing.doc [23.5 KiB]
Downloaded 108 times

User avatar
linker
Joined: 25 Sep 2004
Last visit: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1,350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dookie
I think it's E.


Good solution dookie. OA is E



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105420 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts